Comparison

活动行 vs Kandidate

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

活动行

Features
Read full description

活动行,精彩生活、伴你同行! 活动行是一个汇聚了4600万城市精英的活动社交平台,是您参加行业会议、职场提升、创业路演、人脉拓展、聚会交友、看演出、逛展览/市集、户外旅游的首选平台。 活动行严格审核主办方资质及活动品质,始终坚持做精品活动平台! 目前,已有超过60万优秀主办方在使用活动行举办活动,知名主办方有:抖音、今日头条、快手、ChinaJoy、混沌大学、钛媒体、创业邦、36氪、TEDx、脉脉、BOSS直聘、腾讯、百度、京东技术、美团、微软、阿里云、知乎、英国大使馆、西西弗书店、樊登读书会等。 活动行还是先锋行业风向标,这里您可以找到各类最新、最潮的行业会议、职场沙龙、博览会,如Web3、出海、企业数字化、新能源汽车、生物医疗技术、直播电商等等。 参加活动可增长见识、结识优秀的朋友、丰富您的业余生活。 「联系我们」 如您对我们的产品有任何意见和建议,请联系我们: 客服电话:010-86395931 官方网站:http://www.huodongxing.com 微信公众号:ihuodongxing

About

Kandidate

This app is a personalized fashion and lifestyle sharing social platform. It helps users discover niche fashion trends and connect with others who share similar styles. The app integrates social sharing, location-based discovery of fashion stores, and advanced search capabilities.

Highlights
  • Personalized fashion trend sharing
  • Social networking for style enthusiasts
  • Location-based fashion store discovery
  • Advanced search for styles and users
  • Share fashion outfits and daily life photos
Read full description

Kandidate是一款个性化时尚潮流分享社交的APP,当今年轻人群对小众的个性化时尚生活的追求,已经成为一种趋势,而目前的绝大部分商家大众化经营无法精准满足他们的的需求。我们平台的展现方式更具有空间感,更加简洁明了,我们APP的目标是将碎片化信息整合为一体化。APP涵盖社交模块,地图模块,搜索模块等。社交模块:用户可以在该模块分享自己得时尚穿搭、生活靓照、以及日常打卡。地图模块:该模块能够让用户更加立体得感受到当前城市乃至世界范围的时尚店铺所在之处,用户更是能够在地图模块上时尚社交。该模块融合了地图元素、时尚店铺、动态坐标等技术特点。搜索模块:搜索模块不仅仅可以搜索店铺,靓照等,更可以搜索标签和用户,通过标签更能及时的发现新元素,更贴近自己喜欢的时尚元素。

Screenshots

活动行4 screens
Kandidate4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 活动行 at none against Kandidate's shown. 活动行 also leads on ratings volume (199 vs 3). Kandidate's advantage is rating (5.0 vs 4.8) and iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.0). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Kandidate holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 活动行 has 199 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

活动行 ships an update weekly, Kandidate every 11 days. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
活动行 versus Kandidate: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter活动行Kandidate
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.8 (199 ratings)5.0 (3 ratings) — better
Positive reviews14.3% of reviews—
Number of ratings199 — better3
Update frequencyWeekly — betterEvery 11 days
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Ad-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.011.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size111 MB108 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperAccuvallyKandidate Information Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

活动行

All ratings199 ratings
Positive96.0%
Neutral1.5%
Negative2.5%
Written reviews7 reviews
Positive14.3%
Neutral14.3%
Negative71.4%

Kandidate

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

活动行

No in-app purchases

None

Kandidate

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 活动行 free?
活动行 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Kandidate free?
Kandidate is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 活动行 or Kandidate?
Kandidate is rated higher. 活动行 averages 4.8 out of 5 from 199 ratings, while Kandidate averages 5.0 from 3 ratings.
Do 活动行 or Kandidate have ads?
Kandidate shows ads; 活动行 does not.
Which is updated more often, 活动行 or Kandidate?
活动行 ships an update weekly, and Kandidate every 11 days. Most recently, 活动行 was updated on November 6, 2026 and Kandidate on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons