Astro vs MER PCC
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Astro
This tool calculates your estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic disease events using traditional risk factors and coronary artery calcium scores. It is designed for individuals aged 40-65 without a prior history of ASCVD.
- 10-year ASCVD risk estimation
- Incorporates CAC score
- Uses traditional risk factors
- For individuals 40-65
- No prior ASCVD history required
- Based on large cohort data
Read full descriptionHide full description
The Astronaut Cardiovascular Health and Risk Modification (Astro-CHARM) calculator is a tool that incorporates traditional risk factor information with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score results to provide an individual’s estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic disease (ASCVD) events, including fatal or non-fatal heart attack or stroke. It is intended for use in younger individuals (ages 40-65) without a prior history of ASCVD. The Astro-CHARM was developed using data from three large, population-based cohorts (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Dallas Heart Study, and Prospective Army Coronary Calcium Project), and validated in a fourth cohort (the Framingham Heart Study). Astro-CHARM (aka "astrocharm") was developed by Dr. Amit Khera.
MER PCC
Access medical education resources and register for conferences on the go. Browse by date or topic, view agendas, and manage your professional profile.
- Search and register for conferences
- Browse by date or topic
- View conference agendas
- Manage user profile
- Access medical education resources
Read full descriptionHide full description
Medical Education Resources (MER) is Primary Care’s leading provider of commercial-free CME. Join the hundreds of thousands of your medical professional peers who have enjoyed CME-getaways at locations around the globe. Revel in MER’s signature half-day format at over 120 conferences annually, covering 32 topics, during all times of the year. Within the new MER app search and register for a conference, browse by date or topic, view agendas, and manage your profile all from your mobile device.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: Astro at 4.0 against MER PCC's 3.3. Astro also leads on review sentiment (50% vs 29%) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 12.0). MER PCC's advantage is ratings volume (40 vs 3). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Astro holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: MER PCC has 40 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 50% of Astro's written reviews are positive against 29% of MER PCC's.
| Parameter | Astro | MER PCC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.0 (3 ratings) — better | 3.3 (40 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 50.0% of reviews — better | 28.6% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 3 | 40 — better |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 9.0 — better | 12.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 10 MB | 38 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Amit Khera | Mer Primary Care Conferences |
Customer experience
Astro
MER PCC
In-app purchases
Astro
No in-app purchases
MER PCC
No in-app purchases








