Comparison

Guardinator vs .Field Command.

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Guardinator

Access real-time vehicle sensor data, including RPM, speed, and fuel consumption, displayed in a HUD mode. Monitor tire status and output data to compatible HUD hardware.

Highlights
  • Display all vehicle sensor data via OBD
  • Real-time RPM, speed, and fuel consumption display
  • HUD mode for driving
  • Monitor individual tire status
  • Output data to HUD hardware
Read full description

Guardinator can display all sensors data of your vehicle, provide real-time display in HUD mode, display all tires status of your vehicle... Features included - display all sensors data of your vehicle via OBD interface. - show real-time data like RPM, Speed, Fuel Consumption and etc in HUD mode. - show each tires status of your vehicle. - output real-time data in HUD hardware device.

About

.Field Command.

Features
Read full description

Field Command is the all-in-one dispatch management and field ticketing system built for trucking and oilfield operations. Manage your entire field from one place: - Real-time Dispatch Board — Drag-and-drop driver assignments across client columns. See who's available, who's on a job, and who's done. - Driver Check-In — Drivers submit their availability, unit number, and truck status directly from their phone. - Field Ticketing — Submit field tickets with load details, BBL counts, fluid types, photos, and digital signatures. - Two-Step Verification — Tickets flow through verification and approval. Dispatchers verify, billing approves, invoices generate automatically. - Automated Invoicing — One-click invoice generation with professional formatting. - Live Chat & Push Notifications — Built-in messaging and instant job assignment alerts. Built for oilfield service companies in the Permian Basin.

Screenshots

Guardinator4 screens
.Field Command.4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Guardinator at 9.0 against .Field Command.'s 15.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
Guardinator versus .Field Command.: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterGuardinator.Field Command.
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.8 (11 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews16.7% of reviews—
Number of ratings11 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 2 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS9.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size114 MB2 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperHoneywell International, Inc.Rafael Ayala

In-app purchases

None

Guardinator

No in-app purchases

None

.Field Command.

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Guardinator free?
Guardinator is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is .Field Command. free?
.Field Command. is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Guardinator or .Field Command. have ads?
Neither Guardinator nor .Field Command. shows ads.

Other comparisons