Comparison

天逸播控 vs Clash Mi

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

天逸播控

Features
Read full description

适用于iOS9及以上版本,主要功能: *添加多款天逸设备,实现设备间的统一控制 *切换音源:蓝牙、U盘、TF卡、PC、模拟接口、数字接口等 *控制音量:可通过手机端控制输出音量 *控制播放状态:暂停、上一首、下一首、快进及快退,进入指定文件夹播放歌曲 *语言设置:支持中/英文 *目前兼容的天逸产品:TY-B02、EF-1000、AT-02、TYB03、TYB04、TV10、AD66D、AD-K01、AD300K、AT-01b

About

Clash Mi

This utility app offers powerful meta functions and customization with overwrite support. It provides a built-in board to view running information easily.

Highlights
  • Full meta functions support
  • Powerful overwrite customization
  • Easy to use interface
  • Built-in board for running info
  • View running information anytime
Features
Currently charting
Read full description

1. Support full meta functions 2. Powerful overwrite support, including customization 3. Easy to use 4. Built-in board, running information can be viewed at any time 5. Official website: https://clashmi.app

Screenshots

天逸播控4 screens
Clash Mi3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: Clash Mi at 85% against 天逸播控's 0%. Clash Mi also leads on rating (4.6 vs 3.0) and ratings volume (469 vs 2). 天逸播控's advantage is iOS requirement (13.1 vs 15). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Clash Mi holds the better App Store score, 4.6 against 3.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Clash Mi has 469 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of 天逸播控's written reviews are positive against 85% of Clash Mi's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

天逸播控 ships an update every 2 months, Clash Mi every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 2, 2026 and November 5, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 5 level
天逸播控 versus Clash Mi: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter天逸播控Clash Mi
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)4.6 (469 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews84.5% of reviews — better
Number of ratings2469 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Free
Best chart rank—#195 — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.1 — better15
Further details — not scored
Size18 MB120 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer广州天逸电子有限公司Supernova Nebula LLC

Customer experience

天逸播控

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

Clash Mi

All ratings459 ratings
Positive91.3%
Neutral2.0%
Negative6.8%
Written reviews194 reviews
Positive84.5%
Neutral4.1%
Negative11.3%

Bugs and requests

天逸播控

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

Clash Mi

Reported bugs

2 issues
  • Occasional crashes or freezes
  • Compatibility issues with older devices

Requested features

3 requests
  • Dark mode option
  • Support for custom app icons
  • Improved battery life optimization

In-app purchases

None

天逸播控

No in-app purchases

None

Clash Mi

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 天逸播控 free?
天逸播控 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Clash Mi free?
Clash Mi is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 天逸播控 or Clash Mi?
Clash Mi is rated higher. 天逸播控 averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Clash Mi averages 4.6 from 469 ratings.
Do 天逸播控 or Clash Mi have ads?
Neither 天逸播控 nor Clash Mi shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 天逸播控 or Clash Mi?
天逸播控 ships an update every 2 months, and Clash Mi every 3 weeks. Most recently, 天逸播控 was updated on November 2, 2026 and Clash Mi on November 5, 2026.

Other comparisons