Comparison

手机控车C30 vs 风格控车

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

手机控车C30

This application allows users to remotely control their vehicles. Functions include locking/unlocking doors, opening the trunk, and starting the engine. It also features smart sensing for automatic locking and a shake-to-lock function.

Highlights
  • Remote door lock/unlock
  • Trunk opening
  • Engine start
  • Smart sensing auto lock/unlock
  • Shake to lock/unlock
Read full description

手机控车C30是一款为汽车提供智能控制的APP,您可以使用APP对您的爱车进行开锁、关锁、打开后备箱、启动引擎等操作。APP还提供了非常智能的感应自动开关锁和摇一摇开关锁功能。立即下载体验吧!

About

风格控车

Features
Read full description

一款可以使手机与车辆能远程/近程通讯、交互的终端产品!

Screenshots

手机控车C303 screens
风格控车4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 手机控车C30 at 9.0 against 风格控车's 15.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
手机控车C30 versus 风格控车: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter手机控车C30风格控车
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.4 (10 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews37.5% of reviews—
Number of ratings10 — better—
Update frequency—Every 3 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size9 MB42 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer胜 邓东莞市风格控车汽车科技有限公司

In-app purchases

None

手机控车C30

No in-app purchases

None

风格控车

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 手机控车C30 free?
手机控车C30 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 风格控车 free?
风格控车 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do 手机控车C30 or 风格控车 have ads?
Neither 手机控车C30 nor 风格控车 shows ads.

Other comparisons