ArcGIS QuickCapture vs PigTracker
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
ArcGIS QuickCapture
This app enables rapid collection of field observations, allowing users to record GIS points and attributes efficiently. It's designed for collecting data quickly from a moving vehicle or during surveys.
- Rapid field observation collection
- Record GIS points and attributes
- Data capture at-speed
- Use while moving
- Scouting and survey support
Read full descriptionHide full description
ArcGIS QuickCapture is the fastest way to collect field observations. With this time-saving app, you can record GIS points and other attributes while you scout locations, conduct aerial surveys, or assess damage from a moving vehicle. Capture data at-speed with the touch of a button.
PigTracker
Monitor and track pipeline inspection tools, also known as Pigs. Allows users to virtually "walk" a pipeline Right of Way to locate any stuck inspection equipment.
- Monitor pipeline inspection tools
- Track tool locations
- Virtually walk pipeline Right of Way
- Search for stuck tools
Read full descriptionHide full description
Used to monitor and track pipeline inspection tools (also known as Pigs). Also allows the user to "walk" a pipeline Right of Way to search for a Pig that may have gotten stuck.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: PigTracker at 5.0 against ArcGIS QuickCapture's 4.3. PigTracker also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 64%) and iOS requirement (10.0 vs 13.0). ArcGIS QuickCapture's advantage is ratings volume (35 vs 3). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
PigTracker holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: ArcGIS QuickCapture has 35 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 64% of ArcGIS QuickCapture's written reviews are positive against 100% of PigTracker's.
| Parameter | ArcGIS QuickCapture | PigTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.3 (35 ratings) | 5.0 (3 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 63.6% of reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 35 — better | 3 |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | 10.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 161 MB | 67 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | ESRI | hans Wedemeyer |
Customer experience
ArcGIS QuickCapture
PigTracker
In-app purchases
ArcGIS QuickCapture
No in-app purchases
PigTracker
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is ArcGIS QuickCapture free?
Is PigTracker free?
Which has better reviews, ArcGIS QuickCapture or PigTracker?
Do ArcGIS QuickCapture or PigTracker have ads?
Other comparisons















