Comparison

Avoid'em vs Monocular Shot

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Avoid'em

Navigate through challenging levels by skillfully dodging a variety of obstacles. Test your reflexes and precision to see if you can successfully avoid every hazard presented.

Highlights
  • Dodge various obstacles
  • Challenging levels
  • Test reflexes
  • Precision gameplay
Read full description

Dodge various obstacles. Can you avoid them all?

About

Monocular Shot

Engage in a 2D action shooting game where you must defeat enemies and advance through stages while dodging attacks. Encounter numerous challenges and diverse foes across various levels. Enjoy a free-to-play experience with no waiting or in-app purchases required.

Highlights
  • 2D action shooting gameplay
  • Avoid enemy attacks
  • Multiple stages with gimmicks
  • Variety of enemies
  • Special move system
  • Auto save functionality
Features
Read full description

Monocular Shot is a 2D action shooting game. Defeat the enemy and aim for the next stage while avoiding the enemy's attack. There are many gimmicks and various enemies waiting on the stage. ■ Operation method L: Move left R: Move right A: Shot J: Jump SPECIAL MOVE: Special Move You can use the special move by collecting 5 coins before the combo gauge runs out. This game has no tedious waiting times or billing factors. You can play for free until the ending. Save supports auto save. It may be a little difficult, but I hope you enjoy it.

Screenshots

Avoid'em3 screens
Monocular Shot4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Monocular Shot at 4.7 against Avoid'em's 3.2. Monocular Shot also leads on review sentiment (67% vs 54%). Avoid'em's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Monocular Shot holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 3.2. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Avoid'em has 80 ratings behind it against 11, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 54% of Avoid'em's written reviews are positive against 67% of Monocular Shot's.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
Avoid'em versus Monocular Shot: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAvoid'emMonocular Shot
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.2 (80 ratings)4.7 (11 ratings) — better
Positive reviews54.1% of reviews66.7% of reviews — better
Number of ratings80 — better11
Update frequency—Every 8 months
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree — betterAd-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS8.2 — better12.0
Further details — not scored
Size111 MB43 MB
Age rating9+9+
DeveloperGeisha Tokyo Inc.YUSEI MIYOSHI

Customer experience

Avoid'em

All ratings80 ratings
Positive48.8%
Neutral20.0%
Negative31.3%
Written reviews37 reviews
Positive54.1%
Neutral27.0%
Negative18.9%

Monocular Shot

All ratings11 ratings
Positive90.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews6 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral16.7%
Negative16.7%

In-app purchases

None

Avoid'em

No in-app purchases

None

Monocular Shot

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Avoid'em free?
Avoid'em is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Monocular Shot free?
Monocular Shot is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Avoid'em or Monocular Shot?
Monocular Shot is rated higher. Avoid'em averages 3.2 out of 5 from 80 ratings, while Monocular Shot averages 4.7 from 11 ratings.
Do Avoid'em or Monocular Shot have ads?
Monocular Shot shows ads; Avoid'em does not.

Other comparisons