Comparison

John Libbey journals vs CoLo

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

John Libbey journals

Features
Read full description

The newsstand brings together in a single application all the journals published by John Libbey Eurotext. Subscribers can access their content by simply connecting with their John Libbey IDs (the IDs are identical for www.jle.com and the newsstand) Discovery access is also possible on simple registration in order to access the articles in free access. Our readers can build their own reading journey by managing their favourite library and articles, which remain accessible offline, and enjoy their journal any time. Discover all John Libbey journals: - Annales de Biologie Clinique - Bulletin infirmier du cancer - Dermato Mag - Environnement, risques et santé - Epileptic Disorders - European Cytokine Network - European Journal of Dermatology - Gériatrie et psychologie neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement - Hématologie - Hépato-gastro et Oncologie digestive - Innovations et thérapeutiques en oncologie - Journal de Pharmacie Clinique - L’information psychiatrique - Magnesium Research - Médecine - Médecine de la reproduction - Médecine et Santé Tropicales - Médecine Thérapeutique - Médecine Thérapeutique / Pédiatrie - Revue de neuropsychologie - Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux - Sciences Sociales et santé - Virologie

About

CoLo

Features
Read full description

Over the past several years, it has been clearly demonstrated that patient management in colonoscopy can be optimized — both economically and environmentally — by refraining from systematically submitting all resected colonic polyps for histopathological examination, provided that these polyps meet specific visual and dimensional criteria. Despite this proven benefit and the publication of international recommendations by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE, 2014) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE, 2022), the practical implementation of selective histopathological analysis (Resect-and-Discard and Diagnose-and-Leave strategies) remains limited. This gap between recommendations and clinical practice is primarily due to the challenges associated with the training, certification, and objective evaluation of endoscopists’ ability to characterize polyps accurately. Furthermore, even with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), current systems still fall short of the reliability thresholds required by professional societies. Colo-ID has been developed to address these unmet needs. The application provides a comprehensive training and assessment platform designed for endoscopists. It includes a learning module and an interactive training environment that allow users to review a large number of annotated endoscopic images and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy, characterization skills, and therapeutic decision-making performance. Additionally, Colo-ID quantifies and displays the potential economic savings and carbon footprint reduction associated with the application of the Resect-and-Discard and Diagnose-and-Leave approaches. Finally, the platform also supports the creation and continuous enrichment of a structured database linking endoscopic image features with corresponding histopathological findings. This resource will contribute to the development and training of AI-based decision-support algorithms, with the long-term goal of improving the accuracy, safety, and sustainability of colorectal cancer prevention strategies.

Screenshots

John Libbey journals4 screens
CoLo4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: CoLo at none against John Libbey journals's 10. CoLo also leads on update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 5 months). John Libbey journals's advantage is iOS requirement (10.3 vs 14.0). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. John Libbey journals sells 10 one-off in-app purchases. CoLo asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

John Libbey journals ships an update every 5 months, CoLo every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 30, 2026 and October 14, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 3 level
John Libbey journals versus CoLo: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterJohn Libbey journalsCoLo
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 5 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS10.3 — better14.0
Further details — not scored
Size39 MB24 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperJohn Libbey EurotextAnamorphik Studio

In-app purchases

10 purchases

John Libbey journals

One-time10
  • Médecine et Santé Tropicales$39.99
  • Néphrologie & Thérapeutique$39.99
  • Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux$48.99
Show 7 more
  • Virologie$49.99
  • Parution élec CS Médecine Thér$49.99
  • Revue de Neuropsychologie$54.99
  • Sciences Sociales et Santé$54.99
  • Parution élec Sexologies$59.99
  • L'Orthodontie Française$69.99
  • Med Thérapeutique / pédiatrie$74.99
None

CoLo

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is John Libbey journals free?
John Libbey journals is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is CoLo free?
CoLo is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do John Libbey journals or CoLo have ads?
Neither John Libbey journals nor CoLo shows ads.
Which is updated more often, John Libbey journals or CoLo?
John Libbey journals ships an update every 5 months, and CoLo every 3 weeks. Most recently, John Libbey journals was updated on September 30, 2026 and CoLo on October 14, 2026.

Other comparisons