Apollo vs OxMET
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Apollo
This app digitizes classical neuropsychological assessments using AI for standardized, smarter, and faster evaluations. It incorporates proven testing principles with digital scoring, including innovative speech analysis.
- AI-driven neuropsychological assessments
- Standardized and faster evaluations
- Digital implementation of classic tests
- Automated scoring via speech analysis
- Manual scoring for clinician control
Read full descriptionHide full description
Apollo is an iPad app that digitalises classical neuropsychological assessment using Artificial Intelligence (AI). With Apollo, assessment becomes more standardized, smarter and faster. Apollo implements a wide range of classic neuropsychological tests. These tests are valid and accepted best practice; Apollo keeps their proven principles and valid scoring mechanisms but adds a digital touch. Scoring of tests is done automatically through innovative speech analysis but can be edited manually, so that clinicians stay in control of the diagnostic process.
OxMET
This tool provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. It is automatically scored and evaluated against age-adjusted norms, generating a visual snapshot report for clinical use.
- Ecologically valid assessment
- Naturalistic shopping scenario
- Automatic scoring
- Age-adjusted norms
- Visual snapshot report
- Standardized and validated
Read full descriptionHide full description
OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke). The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is update cadence: Apollo at monthly against OxMET's every 22 months. On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 1.0 for Apollo against 1.0 for OxMET. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.
Apollo ships an update monthly, OxMET every 22 months. The most recent releases landed on September 20, 2026 and September 4, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Apollo | OxMET |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.0 (1 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 1 | 1 |
| Update frequency | Monthly — better | Every 22 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 | 11.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 218 MB | 111 MB |
| Age rating | 12+ | 4+ |
| Developer | ki elements GmbH | University of Oxford |
Customer experience
Apollo
OxMET
In-app purchases
Apollo
No in-app purchases
OxMET
No in-app purchases









