Comparison

AR地球探索 vs 晟立AR地球仪

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

AR地球探索

Explore the Earth and beyond with augmented reality. This app features 12 educational themes, from dinosaurs and world architecture to space and geography, making learning engaging for children. Discover famous landmarks, ancient creatures, and scientific wonders through interactive 3D models and voice technology.

Highlights
  • Augmented Reality (AR) exploration
  • 3D interactive models
  • 12 diverse educational themes
  • Voice technology integration
  • Quiz feature
  • Focus on astronomy and geography
Features
Read full description

《AR地球探索》是一款让地球仪更好玩有趣的应用,利用AR、3D互动、语音等技术,带给用户一种全新的产品体验,用高新技术赋能产品,从而提升品牌在用户心中的口碑。内容丰富,包括12大内容主题,在行业中教育内容是最多的一个应用。有世界上国家著名的建筑,也有远古的恐龙世界,更有天文地理的自然奇观,还有趣味的答题库。让小孩爱上天文地理。 12大主题: * 动物世界; * 恐龙世界; * 世界建筑; * 地理百科; * 天气现象; * 太阳系; * 地球结构; * 世界美食; * 环球名校; * 著名景点; * 世界名人; * 航空航天;

About

晟立AR地球仪

This educational app merges a physical globe with augmented reality to bring the world to life for children. It offers extensive knowledge on animals, landmarks, geography, and cultures through interactive 3D models and engaging audio explanations. Children can explore and learn through immersive play.

Highlights
  • Augmented reality integration
  • Interactive 3D models
  • Animal encyclopedia
  • Landmark and geography facts
  • Cultural information
  • Audio explanations
  • Realistic sound effects
Features
Read full description

《晟立AR地球仪》是一款将地球仪与AR(增强现实)技术相结合的儿童教育类软件。它有着丰富的百科知识内容,包含动物百科、建筑名胜、地理现象和国家人文等等,结合栩栩如生的3D模型动画,打造适合不同年龄层的科学知识体系。只用拿出设备扫一扫,各种动物、建筑等等便如实展现在眼前,配合逼真音效和语音讲解,让孩子玩在其中,学在其中。

Screenshots

AR地球探索3 screens
晟立AR地球仪4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 晟立AR地球仪 at 4.0 against AR地球探索's 3.8. AR地球探索's advantage is ratings volume (9 vs 2). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

晟立AR地球仪 holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.8. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 9 and 2 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

AR地球探索 ships an update every 3 weeks, 晟立AR地球仪 every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 18, 2026 and October 29, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
AR地球探索 versus 晟立AR地球仪: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAR地球探索晟立AR地球仪
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.8 (9 ratings)4.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings9 — better2
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.011.0
Further details — not scored
Size1.8 GB867 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperShenzhen Weijing Technology Co.,Ltd.Li Xu

Customer experience

AR地球探索

All ratings9 ratings
Positive55.6%
Neutral22.2%
Negative22.2%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral25.0%
Negative25.0%

晟立AR地球仪

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral50.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

AR地球探索

No in-app purchases

None

晟立AR地球仪

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is AR地球探索 free?
AR地球探索 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 晟立AR地球仪 free?
晟立AR地球仪 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, AR地球探索 or 晟立AR地球仪?
晟立AR地球仪 is rated higher. AR地球探索 averages 3.8 out of 5 from 9 ratings, while 晟立AR地球仪 averages 4.0 from 2 ratings.
Do AR地球探索 or 晟立AR地球仪 have ads?
Neither AR地球探索 nor 晟立AR地球仪 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, AR地球探索 or 晟立AR地球仪?
AR地球探索 ships an update every 3 weeks, and 晟立AR地球仪 every 5 weeks. Most recently, AR地球探索 was updated on October 18, 2026 and 晟立AR地球仪 on October 29, 2026.

Other comparisons