Comparison

物联查询 vs SUOGONG

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

物联查询

Features
Read full description

为方便用户随时随地掌握车辆状况,物联查询APP,主要功能有查看车辆,多车监控,单车定位和车辆轨迹回放,车辆状态标识,车辆围栏,远程录音,声控录音等.

About

SUOGONG

Track the real-time location of GPS devices and review historical movement data. Set up virtual boundaries to receive immediate alerts when devices leave designated areas. Receive notifications for various events like displacement, low battery, and vibration.

Highlights
  • Real-time GPS device location tracking
  • Historical location data playback
  • Electronic safety fence (geo-fencing)
  • Displacement alerts
  • Low battery notifications
  • Vibration alerts
Features
Read full description

主要功能: 查看GPS定位设备位置,位置实时掌握。 历史轨迹回放,随时回放设备历史位置数据。 电子安全围栏,离开围栏区域立即报警通知。 报警通知,位移、低电、震动等使用报警功能。

Screenshots

物联查询4 screens
SUOGONG4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: SUOGONG at 5.0 against 物联查询's 3.2. SUOGONG also leads on ads (none vs shown). 物联查询's advantage is update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 3 months) and ratings volume (6 vs 1). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

SUOGONG holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.2. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 物联查询 has 6 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

物联查询 ships an update every 3 weeks, SUOGONG every 3 months. The most recent releases landed on November 2, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
物联查询 versus SUOGONG: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter物联查询SUOGONG
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.2 (6 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews9.5% of reviews—
Number of ratings6 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 3 months
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Free
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS11.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size77 MB63 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer洪 刘水利 严

Customer experience

物联查询

All ratings6 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews42 reviews
Positive9.5%
Neutral7.1%
Negative83.3%

SUOGONG

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Bugs and requests

物联查询

Reported bugs

9 issues
  • App constantly offline
  • GPS location inaccurate (significant error)
  • App becomes unusable after updates
  • Notification/alert messages not received
  • Location data shifting/offsetting
Show 4 more
  • App crashes frequently
  • Unable to update app
  • Cannot view historical location data with timestamps
  • Device status shows offline when it's online

Requested features

5 requests
  • Allow manual setting of refresh rate
  • Increase number of geofences
  • Improve registration process
  • Provide clearer instructions for SIM card usage
  • Allow disabling of persistent UI elements on map

SUOGONG

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

物联查询

No in-app purchases

None

SUOGONG

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 物联查询 free?
物联查询 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is SUOGONG free?
SUOGONG is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 物联查询 or SUOGONG?
SUOGONG is rated higher. 物联查询 averages 3.2 out of 5 from 6 ratings, while SUOGONG averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do 物联查询 or SUOGONG have ads?
物联查询 shows ads; SUOGONG does not.
Which is updated more often, 物联查询 or SUOGONG?
物联查询 ships an update every 3 weeks, and SUOGONG every 3 months. Most recently, 物联查询 was updated on November 2, 2026 and SUOGONG on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons