Spider67(m) vs BLE
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Spider67(m)
Read full descriptionHide full description
Based on the App, user can complete the network configuration of the SPMB series gateway, include selecting 4G mode or WiFi mode, WiFi AP mode or client mode, suitable for SPMB-16DIO, SPMB-04AIO, SPMB-04DIO, SPMB-16CIO series gateway.
BLE
Read full descriptionHide full description
此 APP 是蓝牙应用，我们的客户在购买了 Queclink G3/ZK 系列的设备后，可以开启设备上的蓝牙扫描功能，然后客户手机下载此 APP，通过访问sql来登录账号，并用手机去连接扫描蓝牙配件，这样就可以去查询和配置iot设备的相关数据。所有数据均在蓝牙连接下操作，客户也可以选择将本地的日志通过ftp上传至服务器来排查问题。 由于此 APP 是配套应用，会使用 http，无加密需求，故没有使用 https，是正常的。
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Spider67(m) at 10.0 against BLE's 12.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Spider67(m) | BLE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 2 weeks | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 10.0 — better | 12.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 4 MB | 28 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Tianjin Elco Automation Co., Ltd. | Queclink Wireless Solutions Co.,Ltd |
In-app purchases
Spider67(m)
No in-app purchases
BLE
No in-app purchases
