Comparison

东风风神 vs 纸飞机

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

东风风神

Features
Read full description

东风风神车主APP致力于服务广大客户朋友,以有趣、专业的内容,方便您了解东风风神车型信息;为您提供了经销商查询、预约试驾、参与活动等功能,让您购车体验更便捷。更有发帖互动、获取积分等专属服务,请您来体验。 探索:可进行发帖、点赞、回复等互动交流,更有风神合伙人计划,千万积分等您来。 服务:查询经销商相关信息,线上预约保养/维修服务。 选车:查询风神旗下各款车型的参数配置、图片、价格等详细信息。 我的:车主认证及解绑,查看领券、发帖等记录。

About

纸飞机

Features
Read full description

IM聊天:支持发送语音短信、视频、图片(包括表情)和文字,是一种聊天软件,支持多人群聊(最高20000人)。 好友管理:纸飞机支持查找账号、查看通讯录好友添加好友和分享好友添加好友、二维码查找添加好友等几种方式。 实时对话功能:用户可以通过语音聊天室和一群人语音对讲,但与在群里发语音不同的是,这个聊天室的消息几乎是实时的,并且不会留下任何记录,在手机屏幕关闭的情况下也仍可进行实时聊天。 【纸飞机大会员】 -- 双倍上限:可加入多达1000个群组,拥有最多20个分组、10项置顶与20条公开链接,并同时登录4个帐号等等。 -- 表情动画:在您发送的消息中使用多种多样的表情动画。 -- 隐藏广告:纸飞机将不再向您的聊天窗口中投放广告。 -- 专属贴纸:具有特殊小姑哟的专属贴纸,每月更新。 -- 专属身份徽章:您的名称旁将显示--枚徽章以代表您正在支持政纸飞机继续发展。 【自动续费纸飞机大会员】 —— 订阅周期:1个月(纸飞机大会员连续包月产品),12个月(纸飞机大会员连续包年产品)。 —— 订阅价格:以iAP申请信息为准,例如连续包月产品每月38元,连续包年产品每年268元。 —— 付款:用户确认购买并付款后记入iTunes账户。 —— 取消续订:如需取消续订,请在当前订阅周期到期前24小时以前,手动在iTunes/Apple ID设置管理中关闭自动续订功能。 —— 续订:苹果iTunes账户会在到期前24小时内扣费,扣费成功后订阅周期顺延一个订阅周期。 —— 隐私政策:http://im-app-1.planemessenger.com/private —— 用户协议:http://im-app-1.planemessenger.com/service_terms

Screenshots

东风风神4 screens
纸飞机4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 纸飞机 at 3.5 against 东风风神's 1.0. 纸飞机 also leads on ratings volume (17 vs 1) and update cadence (every 8 days vs every 3 weeks). 东风风神's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 23) and ads (none vs shown). On price, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 纸飞机 sells 18 in-app purchases, starting at $4.99 per month. 东风风神 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

纸飞机 holds the better App Store score, 3.5 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 纸飞机 has 17 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

东风风神 ships an update every 3 weeks, 纸飞机 every 8 days. The most recent releases landed on September 17, 2026 and September 22, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 4 level
东风风神 versus 纸飞机: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter东风风神纸飞机
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)3.5 (17 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—58.2% of reviews
Number of ratings117 — better
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeksEvery 8 days — better
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS13.013.0
Further details — not scored
Size589 MB181 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperDongfeng Motor CorporationHuai'an Kapa Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

东风风神

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

纸飞机

All ratings17 ratings
Positive64.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative35.3%
Written reviews55 reviews
Positive58.2%
Neutral5.5%
Negative36.4%

In-app purchases

None

东风风神

No in-app purchases

18 purchases

纸飞机

Subscriptions1
  • 大会员连续包月$4.991 Month
One-time17
  • 8PP币$0.99
  • 50PP币$1.99
  • 300PP币$12.99
Show 14 more
  • 500PP币$19.99
  • 纸飞机年度大会员$39.99
  • 1000PP币$39.99
  • 498PP币$69.99
  • 3486PP币$69.99
  • 2000PP币$89.99
  • 998PP币$149.99
  • 6986PP币$149.99
  • 5000PP币$199.99
  • 10000PP币$399.99
  • 4998PP币$699.99
  • 34986PP币$699.99
  • 20000PP币$899.99
  • 25000PP币$999.99

Questions

Is 东风风神 free?
东风风神 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 纸飞机 free?
纸飞机 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 东风风神 or 纸飞机?
纸飞机 is rated higher. 东风风神 averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 纸飞机 averages 3.5 from 17 ratings.
Do 东风风神 or 纸飞机 have ads?
纸飞机 shows ads; 东风风神 does not.
Which is updated more often, 东风风神 or 纸飞机?
东风风神 ships an update every 3 weeks, and 纸飞机 every 8 days. Most recently, 东风风神 was updated on September 17, 2026 and 纸飞机 on September 22, 2026.

Other comparisons