Comparison

CIF vs SG Tracker

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CIF

Track live golf scores and view real-time leaderboards during tournaments. Enter your scores easily on game day to keep spectators and competitors updated on your round.

Highlights
  • Live leaderboards
  • Real-time score tracking
  • Easy-to-use scoring interface
  • Mobile and desktop compatibility
  • Tournament support
Features
Read full description

The CIF-SS Golf App combines mobile and desktop application technology to allow golfers to view live leaderboards during events and tournaments. On game day, just enter your scores into our easy-to-use scoring interface to let spectators and competitors keep track of your round in real time.

About

SG Tracker

This app provides detailed golf performance analysis using the Strokes Gained method. Track every shot to understand where you're excelling and where to focus your practice, all offline.

Highlights
  • Strokes Gained analysis
  • Offline play
  • Fast shot entry
  • Category breakdown
  • Trend tracking
  • Hole-type performance
  • Easy sharing
Features
Read full description

SG Tracker turns your round into real, actionable data—using the same Strokes Gained method as the pros, built for players who want honest numbers about their game. Enter each shot in seconds as you play, and get the full picture the moment you step off the 18th green: discover exactly where you are gaining strokes, where you are losing them, and which part of your game to practice next. HOW IT WORKS Every shot you log is compared against baseline expected-strokes data across five key categories: Off the Tee, Approach, Around the Green, Recovery, and Putting. That comparison is Strokes Gained—a metric that reveals not just what you scored, but how every shot actually performed. BUILT FOR THE COURSE - Fast, Minimal Entry: Designed for quick taps between shots so it never slows down your play. - 100% Offline: No Wi-Fi or cellular signal required—works anywhere on the course. - Automatic Tap-In Detection: Putts inside 2 feet are recognized automatically, saving unnecessary taps. - Bunker & Holed-Out Tracking: Simple one-tap flags for bunker lies and holed-out shots—checking "Holed Out" skips putting entry entirely. - Putting Detail: Log putts with optional slope and break entries for deeper green-reading insights. - Hole & Round Notes: Jot quick notes on any hole or the whole round—pin position, conditions, swing thoughts—for context later. DEEP POST-ROUND ANALYSIS - Category Breakdown: See total Strokes Gained broken down by Off the Tee, Approach, Around the Green, Recovery, and Putting. - Trend Tracking: Monitor performance over any date range to verify if your practice is paying off. - Hole-Type Performance: View Par 3, 4, and 5 stats separately to identify your most costly hole layouts. - Approach Precision: Review pin proximity and landing position breakdowns on approach and par-3 tee shots. - Easy Sharing: Share round summaries with your coach or friends in a single tap. YOUR DATA, YOUR PRIVACY SG Tracker works completely offline with no account required. Create an optional free account only if you want to sync your rounds seamlessly across your devices. No ads. No clutter. Just clear answers on where your game stands.

Screenshots

CIF4 screens
SG Tracker4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: SG Tracker at 5.0 against CIF's 2.7. CIF's advantage is ratings volume (22 vs 4). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

SG Tracker holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 2.7. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: CIF has 22 ratings behind it against 4, so its average is the more settled of the two.

Scorecard2 real differences · 7 level
CIF versus SG Tracker: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCIFSG Tracker
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.7 (22 ratings)5.0 (4 ratings) — better
Number of ratings22 — better4
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeks—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.115.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size80 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperWanamaker CorporationYanfeng Wu

Customer experience

CIF

All ratings20 ratings
Positive40.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative60.0%

SG Tracker

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

CIF

No in-app purchases

None

SG Tracker

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is CIF free?
CIF is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is SG Tracker free?
SG Tracker is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, CIF or SG Tracker?
SG Tracker is rated higher. CIF averages 2.7 out of 5 from 22 ratings, while SG Tracker averages 5.0 from 4 ratings.
Do CIF or SG Tracker have ads?
Neither CIF nor SG Tracker shows ads.

Other comparisons