Comparison

E_Test vs JK BMS

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

E_Test

This app connects to Bluetooth meters to display real-time voltage, current, and power consumption. It allows users to view historical data through curves and supports DC, AC, and USB meters for simple, direct connection.

Highlights
  • Real-time voltage, current, power display
  • View power consumption curves
  • Connects to DC, AC, USB meters
  • Simple Bluetooth connection
  • Historical data viewing
Features
Read full description

etest是一款连接蓝牙电表后可以实时查看电压电流功耗的app,查看电压电流功耗曲线。可连接直流交流usb三种表。使用非常简单,连接电表即可。

About

JK BMS

This utility app connects via Bluetooth to an active balancer for battery management. It allows for real-time monitoring of system status, setting operational parameters, and controlling battery management devices.

Highlights
  • Real-time status monitoring
  • Running parameter settings
  • Battery management system device control
  • Bluetooth connectivity
  • Active balancer integration
Features
Read full description

This APP is used for battery management systems and connects to active equalizers via Bluetooth, enabling the display and setting of parameters for the active equalizers. The specific functional modules are as follows: - Real-time status monitoring; - Operating parameter setting; - Battery management system equipment control.

Screenshots

E_Test1 screens
JK BMS4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: JK BMS at 100% against E_Test's 15%. JK BMS also leads on rating (4.3 vs 1.8). E_Test's advantage is ratings volume (31 vs 7) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 15.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

JK BMS holds the better App Store score, 4.3 against 1.8. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 31 and 7 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 15% of E_Test's written reviews are positive against 100% of JK BMS's.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
E_Test versus JK BMS: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterE_TestJK BMS
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.8 (31 ratings)4.3 (7 ratings) — better
Positive reviews15.4% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings31 — better7
Update frequency—Weekly
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size20 MB17 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer杰 唐鹏 张

Customer experience

E_Test

All ratings30 ratings
Positive10.0%
Neutral13.3%
Negative76.7%
Written reviews65 reviews
Positive15.4%
Neutral23.1%
Negative61.5%

JK BMS

All ratings7 ratings
Positive85.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative14.3%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

E_Test

No in-app purchases

None

JK BMS

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is E_Test free?
E_Test is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is JK BMS free?
JK BMS is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, E_Test or JK BMS?
JK BMS is rated higher. E_Test averages 1.8 out of 5 from 31 ratings, while JK BMS averages 4.3 from 7 ratings.
Do E_Test or JK BMS have ads?
Neither E_Test nor JK BMS shows ads.

Other comparisons