Comparison

Mako Support vs CTE Calculator

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Mako Support

This application serves as an interface for certified calibrators of a specific backflow assembly test kit. It allows users to read tool information, perform calibration adjustments, and update firmware on compatible devices. Bluetooth connectivity is required for interaction.

Highlights
  • Read tool information
  • Perform calibration adjustments
  • Confirm calibration
  • Update firmware
  • Bluetooth connectivity
Features
Read full description

The support application for CERTIFIED CALIBRATORS of the MAKO backflow assembly test kit, by Arbiter. (Not intended for MAKO users) Designed for service centers and calibration labs, this app provides an interface for: 1.) Reading tool information 2.) Performing calibration adjustments and confirming calibration 3.) Updating the firmware on all Mako Models Enable Bluetooth on your mobile phone to interface with MAKO.

About

CTE Calculator

This utility app helps determine the change in length of common manufacturing materials caused by temperature fluctuations. It provides quick calculations for various materials, making it a handy tool for engineers and manufacturers on the go.

Highlights
  • Temperature effect calculations
  • Change in length determination
  • Common manufacturing materials
  • Portable utility
  • iOS compatible
Features
Read full description

Quickly determine change in length for common manufacturing materials due to temperature effects anywhere, anytime with the VS CTE app for iOS.

Screenshots

Mako Support4 screens
CTE Calculator3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: CTE Calculator at 13.4 against Mako Support's 15.6. On price, rating, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Mako Support against 5.0 for CTE Calculator. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Mako Support ships an update every 12 months, CTE Calculator every 15 months. Both last shipped on October 6, 2026.

Scorecard1 real difference · 8 level
Mako Support versus CTE Calculator: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterMako SupportCTE Calculator
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings)
Number of ratings11
Update frequencyEvery 12 months — betterEvery 15 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.613.4 — better
Further details — not scored
Size32 MB24 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperArbiter IncorporatedVerisurf

Customer experience

Mako Support

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

CTE Calculator

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Mako Support

No in-app purchases

None

CTE Calculator

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Mako Support free?
Mako Support is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CTE Calculator free?
CTE Calculator is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Mako Support or CTE Calculator?
Mako Support and CTE Calculator are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 1 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do Mako Support or CTE Calculator have ads?
Neither Mako Support nor CTE Calculator shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Mako Support or CTE Calculator?
Mako Support ships an update every 12 months, and CTE Calculator every 15 months. Most recently, Mako Support was updated on October 6, 2026 and CTE Calculator on October 6, 2026.

Other comparisons