Comparison

酷飞视频 vs 蓝山录屏大师

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

酷飞视频

Read full description

酷飞视频是一款万能播放器,倍速播放视频,地图,集录制视频、录音、提取音频、图片编辑、播放视频为一体的APP,适合教育,学习,办公,尤其便于各个年龄段学生已录制视频的方式记录课堂要点课下复习的APP,也可以导入网络课程循环播放视频,操作简单方便,纯绿色APP 放心使用。

About

蓝山录屏大师

Features
Read full description

蓝山录屏大师是一款简单易用的高清录屏软件,支持快速录制屏幕,对录屏的清晰度/声音/录制方向可自定义设置;录制后的视频可以剪辑编辑,修改声音,添加字幕贴图水印等各个功能。 特点: 1.一键录屏,操作简单 2.录屏分辨率可调,高清流畅 3.支持音频降噪,提高录屏效果 4.支持各种水印功能 5.可对视频进行压缩,减少储存空间压力 会员自动订阅说明: -付款:用户确认购买并付款后计入iTunes账号。 -订阅将自动续订,除非您在当前订阅周期结束前至少提前24小时关闭自动续订。 -免费试用订阅将自动续订,除非在续订前24小时取消。 -免费试用期的任何未试用部分(如果提供)将在用户购买该出版物的订阅时丧失。 -苹果iTunes账户会在到期前24小时内扣费,扣费成功后订阅周期顺延一个订阅周期。 -订阅可以由用户管理,并且可以在购买后进入用户的账户设置来关闭自动续订。 -订阅可无限制的访问我们的高级功能 隐私政策:http://zuowen.bikao.com/agreement/new_privacy.html 服务条款:http://wm-screen.lanshan.com/html/fileadmin/agreement.html

Screenshots

酷飞视频4 screens
蓝山录屏大师4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: 蓝山录屏大师 at 2 against 酷飞视频's —. 酷飞视频's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.0). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 3 level
酷飞视频 versus 蓝山录屏大师: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter酷飞视频蓝山录屏大师
PriceFreeFree
Ads—No
In-app purchasesNoNo
Devices—iPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS12.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size186 MB15 MB
Age rating4+17+
Developer涛 祝Shanghai Lanshan Office Software Co., Ltd

In-app purchases

None

酷飞视频

No in-app purchases

None

蓝山录屏大师

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 酷飞视频 free?
酷飞视频 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 蓝山录屏大师 free?
蓝山录屏大师 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons