Qpath E Mobile vs ICBCC
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Qpath E Mobile
This medical app allows physicians to view and document studies, sign exam worksheets, and perform quality assurance remotely. It supports creating external camera DICOM exams to document patient symptoms, with seamless transfer to the main solution for workstation or mobile access.
- View and document studies
- Sign exam worksheets
- Perform QA remotely
- Create external camera DICOM exams
- Document patient symptoms
- Transfer exams to Qpath E instance
Read full descriptionHide full description
Qpath E Mobile is an extension to Qpath E solution that allows physicians to view and document their studies, sign exam worksheets and perform QA on the go! In addition to ultrasound exams, physicians can now create external camera DICOM exams in order to document patient symptoms. To create a new Camera DICOM exam, User can select an existing patient from a worklist, scan a patient barcode with an embedded application scanner or add a patient to the worklist manually. With the camera mode enabled, User may select an exam type and department to send an exam to. Exams with camera pictures and videos are transferred to Qpath E instance and can be accessed from any workstation or a mobile device.
ICBCC
This medical chatbot provides instant access to information from the Internet Book of Critical Care. Users can query the extensive database to find critical care knowledge. It's designed for quick retrieval of essential medical information.
- Internet Book of Critical Care access
- Query critical care information
- Instant knowledge retrieval
- Medical reference tool
Read full descriptionHide full description
Chatbot that allows users to query the Internet Book of Critical Care
Screenshots
Verdict
Qpath E Mobile and ICBCC are too close to call on the numbers: across 8 compared parameters — price, rating, ratings volume and ads among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Qpath E Mobile against 5.0 for ICBCC. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.
| Parameter | Qpath E Mobile | ICBCC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (1 ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) |
| Number of ratings | 1 | 1 |
| Update frequency | Every 3 weeks | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 16.4 | 15.1 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 66 MB | 23 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Telexy | Luis Carlos Arthur Gago Jr |
Customer experience
Qpath E Mobile
ICBCC
In-app purchases
Qpath E Mobile
No in-app purchases
ICBCC
No in-app purchases
