Comparison

洛书 vs 雨见浏览器

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

洛书

This input method offers a unique approach to typing by dividing pinyin into initial and final sounds. It features innovative keyboard layouts and input rules designed for efficiency and a fresh user experience.

Highlights
  • Dual-pin yin input method variant
  • Innovative keyboard layouts (12-key and 26-key)
  • Gesture-based input (sliding)
  • Efficient typing with low learning curve
  • Unique input experience
  • Customizable skins
Read full description

岁寒输入法可以视作是双拼输入法在一个变种,它同样是将拼音分为声母与韵母两个部分分别输入,如“将”字的拼音应分为j+iang两个部分,无声母的字则视作虚声母(但不必输入)与韵母,如“安”字在拼音则直接为an; 其使用方法十分简单; 岁寒十二宫格方案的使用方法: 当需要输入单个字母的拼音时,点击拼音所在的单键或执行拼音所在的三合键的规定操作; 当需要输入带h的声母时,从包含该拼音首字母的键位上滑一行; 当需要输入带n的韵母时,在完成n字母之前的部分之后,下滑一行,视为输入了字母n; 当需要输入带g的韵母时,在完成g字母之前的部分之后,下滑一行,视为输入了字母g; 对于其他拼音或拼音的其他部分,依次划过包含相应字母的键位即可; 岁寒26键方案的使用方法: 1,单个的声母或韵母直接点击获得,如声母b,单击b键即可获得; 2,带h的声母从首字母滑到第二行,如声母sh,从s键滑行到第二行即可获得; 3,带n的韵母从首字母滑到第三行,如韵母an,从a键滑行到第三行即可获得; 4,带ng的韵母从首字母滑到第四行,如韵母ang,从a键滑行到第四行即可获得; 5,利用y,r这两个声韵混合键可以快速的输入un,in,ing,以韵母in为例,从键r滑行到第四行即可获得; 6,其它的韵母依照字母顺序滑过即可,如韵母iao,从i键滑行到a键,再滑行到o键即可; 本输入法重新设计了键盘和拼音输入的规则,并且拥有大量特色功能,操作简洁,学习成本低,输入效率高,是一种不同于以往拼音输入法的新方式,将会给疲倦于旧形式的您以一种全新的输入体验。 用户评价: 风来的西林:起先是好奇图个新鲜下来玩的,而今放弃搜狗是发现这个键盘够大,从不用九宫格的我,全键盘经常误触,而且这个滑着爽快,熟练了速度也不慢。关键还与众不同阿!我喜欢!感谢作者给我带来的快乐,做的这么完善该是花费了怎样精力…… WolframR:这个输入法的输入概念相当的创新。对于以前使用双拼的人来说相当的容易上手。唯独有一点不喜欢的是。更习惯是点按的操作方式。岁寒更多采用的是滑行。这一点有时候让人很不习惯。不过不得不说的确是一个很好的输入法 庭雨陌路:唔……被一个学长安利过来的,刚开始时不太会用,毕竟我只会24拼音啊哈哈哈哈[w害羞]后来看了滑行图例,才发现这个输入法真的很棒棒哦,既简单又方便,额,可能还夹杂了一些我对学长的小情感[doge笑哭]总之就是喜欢的不行#(吐舌)可能由于岁寒走的是系统风吧,输入法的皮肤和一般女生用的有很大不同(我的皮肤被室友吐槽过丑n次),不过我不care啊,毕竟我喜欢简洁,况且她们也不会用我的岁寒啊#(乖)[doge呵斥] 喜欢岁寒#(滑稽) 岁寒,然后知松柏之后凋也。#(滑稽)#(滑稽) 张辞修:其实我感觉喜欢这个输入法的都是不喜欢和其他人一样的,就是想和别人有点不一样,这才是我用岁寒的最大原因,其次才是更快的输入体验。 我的呸:不跟随,做自己 Arthurhawk:试着用了几个月,感觉岁寒越用越顺手了。新的键盘排布不可避免的会需要一定的学习成本,但是使用的感觉还是很顺畅的,此外回退重选和指定拼音重输等,非常贴心实用,用起来也十分便利。 布莱克哈特:感觉挺方便的,虽然刚开始需要记键位,但是学习成本真的不高,比刚学双拼那时候上手容易多了。 Celestia:不错,看了说明感觉非常好,我会喜欢的。还不熟有点慢,确实好用!! 战略合作伙伴:落格输入法 X

About

雨见浏览器

Features
Read full description

雨见浏览器,为ios带来更高的可玩性 ·极简:超大屏浸润式网页浏览,清爽主页,自由更换壁纸 ·好玩:兼容大部分油猴脚本,自由定制你的玩机方案 .安全:Adblock+Brave Shield 极致的隐私保护,免除广告侵扰 ·智能:AI助力搜索,给搜索引擎叠加BUFF ·聚合:聚合搜索,你可以快捷的切换搜索引擎 ·同步:登录账号,书签、主页图标、密码可以进行多端同步 ·开源:代码开源,所有人都可以进行查看 全部功能: ·稍后播放,将视频保存到播放列表 ·自定义沉浸式壁纸 ·无痕模式 ·下拉刷新 ·网页搜索 ·开发者工具 ·夜间模式 ·二维码扫描 ·桌面模式 ·pdf导出 ·书签导入导出

Screenshots

洛书4 screens
雨见浏览器3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 洛书 at 5.0 against 雨见浏览器's 4.5. 洛书 also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 78%). 雨见浏览器's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 6) and ratings volume (14 vs 3). On price, update cadence, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 洛书 sells 6 one-off in-app purchases. 雨见浏览器 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

洛书 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 14 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 100% of 洛书's written reviews are positive against 78% of 雨见浏览器's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

洛书 ships an update every 4 weeks, 雨见浏览器 every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 23, 2026 and October 7, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
洛书 versus 雨见浏览器: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter洛书雨见浏览器
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (3 ratings) — better4.5 (14 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews — better77.8% of reviews
Number of ratings314 — better
Update frequencyEvery 4 weeks — betterEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS14.5 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size127 MB174 MB
Age rating4+17+
Developer楷杰 黄键 金

Customer experience

洛书

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

雨见浏览器

All ratings14 ratings
Positive85.7%
Neutral7.1%
Negative7.1%
Written reviews9 reviews
Positive77.8%
Neutral22.2%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

6 purchases

洛书

One-time6
  • 订阅30天高级功能$0.99
  • 365天内支持2台设备$2.99
  • 订阅360天高级功能$2.99
Show 3 more
  • 订阅90天高级功能$2.99
  • 365天内支持3台设备$3.99
  • 365天内支持4台设备$5.99
None

雨见浏览器

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 洛书 free?
洛书 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 雨见浏览器 free?
雨见浏览器 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 洛书 or 雨见浏览器?
洛书 is rated higher. 洛书 averages 5.0 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while 雨见浏览器 averages 4.5 from 14 ratings.
Do 洛书 or 雨见浏览器 have ads?
Neither 洛书 nor 雨见浏览器 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 洛书 or 雨见浏览器?
洛书 ships an update every 4 weeks, and 雨见浏览器 every 5 weeks. Most recently, 洛书 was updated on September 23, 2026 and 雨见浏览器 on October 7, 2026.

Other comparisons