aTrust vs TrustCyberLink
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
aTrust
This app provides core security capabilities for digital transformation based on a zero trust architecture. It offers SPA protection, adaptive authentication, and dynamic endpoint environment detection to safeguard enterprises and institutions from complex internal threats.
- Zero trust architecture
- SPA protection
- Adaptive authentication
- Dynamic endpoint detection
- App access verification
- Permission baselines
- Dynamic access control
Read full descriptionHide full description
As digital transformation continues to reshape the IT landscape, security boundaries have become increasingly blurred, and complex internal threats pose ever greater challenges to enterprises and institutions. Based on the zero trust architecture, Sangfor aTrust provides core security capabilities to safeguard digital transformation, including SPA protection, adaptive authentication, dynamic endpoint environment detection, app access verification, permission baselines, and dynamic access control.
TrustCyberLink
This business security system enforces zero trust principles for unified, secure access. It hides applications, mandates multi-factor authentication, and grants minimal permissions to prevent unauthorized access and lateral movement. The system streamlines management, boosts efficiency, and ensures rapid compliance with security standards.
- Unified secure access
- Application hiding
- Multi-factor authentication
- Minimal privilege access
- Comprehensive audit logs
- Reduced management costs
- Seamless user experience
Read full descriptionHide full description
绿盟零信任SDP访问安全系统，遵循零信任理念而设计，能够为客户提供以下价值： Ø统一安全可信访问 ‒全面隐藏应用，减少暴露面 ‒统一MFA认证，杜绝弱口令，避免未授权访问 ‒按需最小权限，防止越权访问，攻击横向扩散 ‒全面日志审计，关联分析，闭环处置 Ø全方位降本提效 ‒提高办公访问效率，提高员工工作效率 ‒身份、认证、应用、权限、审计统一管理，节约管理成本 ‒业务灵活扩展，数字化转型无忧 Ø零改造快速合规 ‒统一多因素认证，满足等保2.0对身份认证因子相关要求 ‒全面隐藏，避免检查出不必要的端口开放和漏洞 ‒无需大批量业务改造和替换，快速合规 Ø一致便捷的用户体验 ‒访问低延迟，更少等待 ‒无密码认证，无需记忆繁杂密码， ‒内外网统一入口，统一账户，一致的访问体验
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: TrustCyberLink at 5.0 against aTrust's 1.2. aTrust's advantage is ratings volume (26 vs 1). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
TrustCyberLink holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.2. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: aTrust has 26 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.
Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 14, 2026 and September 29, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | aTrust | TrustCyberLink |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.2 (26 ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 6.5% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 26 — better | 1 |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | Every 2 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | 13.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 125 MB | 11 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | SANGFOR Technologies Company Limited | NSFOCUS Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
Customer experience
aTrust
TrustCyberLink
In-app purchases
aTrust
No in-app purchases
TrustCyberLink
No in-app purchases
