Comparison

法律硕士圣题库 vs 登岸公考

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

法律硕士圣题库

Read full description

专为法律硕士考试精心准备的考试配套题库,每一道试题都有答案解析,为考试提供了充分的复习准备,可随时随地学习练习,支持手机、平板多端同时使用。 【内容】 397法硕联考专业基础(法学) 497法硕联考综合(法学) 398法硕联考专业基础(非法学) 498法硕联考综合(非法学) 【圣题库介绍】 1.产品内容特点 ①更新及时,根据最新大纲或教材修订补充; ②题量大,多个刷题板块,历年真题、章节习题、模拟试题; ③考点全,部分有视频讲解重难点,随题观看; ④解析完善,深入浅出。 2.软件功能特点 ①三大做题模式,适应不同需要; ②详细做题记录,把握复习进度; ③关键词搜索试题,哪里不懂搜哪里; ④错题自动收录,好题手动收藏,查漏补缺; ⑤分析错题记录,个性化智能出题。

About

登岸公考

Read full description

登岸公考,医疗事业编、辅警可参与学习!所有教师都有上岸经验,上过岸的人才能带你上岸!

Screenshots

法律硕士圣题库4 screens
登岸公考2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 登岸公考 at none against 法律硕士圣题库's 10. 登岸公考 also leads on iOS requirement (9.0 vs 11.0). 法律硕士圣题库's advantage is device support. On price there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 法律硕士圣题库 sells 10 one-off in-app purchases. 登岸公考 asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard3 real differences · 3 level
法律硕士圣题库 versus 登岸公考: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter法律硕士圣题库登岸公考
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — better—
Requires iOS11.09.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size43 MB54 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperSheng Cai E-books (Wuhan) Co., Ltd.宇 高

In-app purchases

10 purchases

法律硕士圣题库

One-time10
  • 圣才月卡VIP会员$3.99
  • 圣才季卡VIP会员$9.99
  • 88圣才币$12.99
Show 7 more
  • 128圣才币$19.99
  • 圣才半年卡VIP会员$19.99
  • 圣才考研半年卡VIP会员$19.99
  • 168圣才币$24.99
  • 208圣才币$29.99
  • 圣才年卡VIP会员$29.99
  • 圣才考研年卡VIP会员$29.99
None

登岸公考

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 法律硕士圣题库 free?
法律硕士圣题库 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 登岸公考 free?
登岸公考 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons