Comparison

潮多多 vs 众得利

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

潮多多

Features
Read full description

【潮货哪里多?上潮多多!】 潮多多,潮流社区领军者,风靡时尚圈的潮流货源社区。在潮多多,品牌货、工厂货、档口货等,全部源头价。莆田、泉州、广州、江苏、东莞等优质厂商的聚集地,为用户提供低价和品质、助您成为时尚弄潮儿。 【潮品利器,穿搭精选】 大神级潮牌玩家随心联系,找鞋、搜鞋,一站式服务社区。最ing最新的Nike、adidas等潮流装备推荐,更轻松找到潮货源头,达成一次完美的潮流穿搭体验。 【大牌精选,奢品低价】 各类潮玩手表、精美包包、一线潮服等奢侈品信息共享,无论是工厂直销、或是档口批发,都能让用户以最方便快捷的方式联系到,来到潮多多,秒变时尚潮人。无论在家、在旅行、在工作,打开潮多多就能拥有他人追求的潮流生活。 【电商新势力,创业好帮手】 潮多多云集各大网销平台源头厂商,使用户能直接一对一联系到工厂。一件就是批发价,支持全国免费代理、一件代发等服务,以及源源不断的新潮货源,海量的精准用户,无门槛随机刷新展示,潮多多助力您的电商创业之路。

About

众得利

Read full description

众得利是一款在线商城,可以选择自提和物流发货,方便快捷 2、分享给好友,好友购买商品,可以获得相应的一级奖励,不超过二级 3、首页,展示企业文化和商品 4、分类,展示各站各样的商品分类 5、购物车,商品一键加入购物车,方便快捷 6、个人中心,展示订单数据,海报邀请,团队人数,自提订单数据

Screenshots

潮多多3 screens
众得利4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 众得利 at none against 潮多多's 1. 众得利 also leads on iOS requirement (9.0 vs 12.0). 潮多多's advantage is device support. On price there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 潮多多 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. 众得利 asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard3 real differences · 3 level
潮多多 versus 众得利: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter潮多多众得利
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 24 months—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
DevicesiPhone, iPod — better—
Requires iOS12.09.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size61 MB76 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperXiamen Duochao Network Technology Co.,ltd.Guangzhou Zhongdeli e-commerce Co., LTD

In-app purchases

1 purchases

潮多多

One-time1
  • 潮多多会员服务$37.99
None

众得利

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 潮多多 free?
潮多多 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 众得利 free?
众得利 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons