Comparison

CPLinQ vs MobileScan 23

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side โ€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CPLinQ

Read full description

Manage and configure your fleet of Chicago Pneumatic connected tools - Control your tightenings and work sequences - Maintain your tool - Analyze your work - Lock and find your tools

About

MobileScan 23

Read full description

MobileScan is a web application wrapper that gives a full-screen browser experience for mobile devices and enables the integration of bluetooth barcode scanners to accept and process barcode scans. It also has a capability to monitor for bluetooth beacons.

Screenshots

CPLinQ4 screens
MobileScan 232 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: MobileScan 23 at none against CPLinQ's shown. CPLinQ's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price ยท Rating ยท Positive reviews ยท Number of ratings ยท Update frequency ยท Ads ยท In-app purchases ยท Monetization ยท Best chart rank ยท Devices ยท Requires iOS

CostPrice ยท In-app purchases ยท Ads ยท Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences ยท 4 level
CPLinQ versus MobileScan 23: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCPLinQMobileScan 23
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 5 monthsโ€”
AdsYesNo โ€” better
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.0 โ€” better13.0
Further details โ€” not scored
Size40 MB5 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperChicago PneumaticRyan Wirth

In-app purchases

None

CPLinQ

No in-app purchases

None

MobileScan 23

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is CPLinQ free?
CPLinQ is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is MobileScan 23 free?
MobileScan 23 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do CPLinQ or MobileScan 23 have ads?
CPLinQ shows ads; MobileScan 23 does not.

Other comparisons