Comparison

Concrete Testing vs Code Snap

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Concrete Testing

This app assists with concrete testing by following the IC-652 form from the Indiana Department of Transportation. It provides tools for three essential tests: Concrete Yield, Concrete Air, and Concrete Slump, crucial for job site concrete placement.

Highlights
  • Follows IC-652 INDOT form
  • Concrete Yield testing
  • Concrete Air testing
  • Concrete Slump testing
  • Designed for job site use
Read full description

Concrete Testing follows the IC-652 form from the Indiana Department of Transportation for testing concrete. The app is divided into three screens, Concrete Yield, Concrete Air, and Concrete Slump. These are the three tests required by INDOT when placing concrete on a job site.

About

Code Snap

This app provides quick, practical guidance on ADA accessibility standards for design and construction professionals. It simplifies complex ADA documents, offering clear explanations for clearances, slopes, and layouts to help avoid inspection failures and rework.

Highlights
  • Practical ADA accessibility guidance
  • Reference clearances, slopes, and layouts
  • Simplify dense ADA documents
  • Reduce failed inspections
  • Field-ready explanations
  • AI-generated answers
Features
Read full description

Get fast, practical ADA accessibility guidance built for real-world design, inspection, and construction scenarios. Code Snap: AI ADA Guide helps contractors, inspectors, architects, designers, builders and homeowners quickly reference accessibility requirements without digging through dense ADA documents. Use it to refrence clearances, slopes, reach ranges, layouts, and common accessibility details during planning, plan review, field work, or pre-inspection. Designed for professionals who need clear, defensible explanations they can use on the job. Common ADA Topics • Door and hallway clearances • Turning spaces and maneuvering clearances • Ramp slopes, runs, and landings • Reach ranges (forward and side) • Accessible parking requirements • Counter, sink, and work surface heights • Toilet rooms and grab bar placement • Floor space and transfer areas • Signage and tactile requirements • Residential vs public accessibility questions Why Professionals Use Code Snap • Faster than searching ADA standards or online references • Helps reduce failed inspections and rework • Clear, practical explanations for field use • Useful for plan review and pre-inspection checks • Built for contractors, inspectors, and designers Simple Pricing • Use Code Responses with tokens • Buy only what you need • No subscription required How Answers Are Generated Code Snap AI uses structured accessibility logic, publicly available accessibility principles, and real-world field experience to generate clear, consistent guidance. It does not reproduce ADA standards text. All explanations are paraphrased and simplified for practical use based on the 2010 ADA Standards. Important Note Code Snap AI is independently created and is not affiliated with the U.S. Access Board, Department of Justice (DOJ), the ADA, or ICC/ANSI A117.1. Always verify requirements with the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Terms of Use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Screenshots

Concrete Testing4 screens
Code Snap3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Concrete Testing at none against Code Snap's 3. Concrete Testing also leads on iOS requirement (15.6 vs 17.0). On price, rating, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Code Snap sells 3 one-off in-app purchases. Concrete Testing asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Concrete Testing against 5.0 for Code Snap. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 2 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Concrete Testing ships an update fortnightly, Code Snap every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 3, 2026 and October 30, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Concrete Testing versus Code Snap: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterConcrete TestingCode Snap
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (3 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings3 — better2
Update frequencyFortnightlyEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS15.6 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size17 MB16 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperJoseph BachmanMagnitude LLC

Customer experience

Concrete Testing

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Code Snap

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Concrete Testing

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

Code Snap

One-time3
  • Starter$0.99
  • Basic$2.99
  • Pro$4.99

Questions

Is Concrete Testing free?
Concrete Testing is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Code Snap free?
Code Snap is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Concrete Testing or Code Snap?
Concrete Testing and Code Snap are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 3 and 2 ratings respectively.
Do Concrete Testing or Code Snap have ads?
Neither Concrete Testing nor Code Snap shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Concrete Testing or Code Snap?
Concrete Testing ships an update fortnightly, and Code Snap every 2 weeks. Most recently, Concrete Testing was updated on November 3, 2026 and Code Snap on October 30, 2026.

Other comparisons