Comparison

Manual Reads vs CodeInsight

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Manual Reads

Manually input meter readings without needing specific hardware. This utility app simplifies data entry for submetering systems.

Highlights
  • Manual meter reading entry
  • No hardware installation required
  • Data input for submetering systems
  • User-friendly interface
Features
Read full description

The Manual Read App by NextCentury allows users to manual enter reads for meters without installing NextCentury equipment.

About

CodeInsight

Read and analyze programming code on mobile devices with extensive language support and syntax highlighting. Features include GitHub integration, code searching, and symbol navigation, eliminating the need for a PC for code review.

Highlights
  • Extensive programming language support
  • Syntax highlighting for multiple languages
  • GitHub browsing and code downloading
  • Code search and symbol navigation
  • Upload code via Wi-Fi and iTunes
  • Support for various archive formats (Tar, Zip)
Features
Read full description

This app is aimed to provide a solution for user to reading programming code on mobile devices like phone and pad. The app provides rich features to make code reading a really easy thing with mobile devices, which makes you really don’t need a PC for code reading. 1. Supported reading codes written in languages in: C, C++, Java, Python, ObjectiveC, C#, Basic, JavaScript, PHP, Perl, Bash, Zsh, Csh, Ruby, Assembly Language, Go, Rust, R, Tcl and a lot of other languages like: Ada, Ant, Asp, Awk, CMake, CSS, Diff, DTD, Bat, Powershell, Eiffel, Erlang, Falcon, Flex, Fortran, HTML, JSON, Lisp, Lua, Matlab, OCalm, Pascal, REXX, SQL, VHDL, Vim, SVG, XML 2. Support programming language syntax highlight for programming languages below: C, C++, C#, Java, Objective C, Eiffel, Fortran, Html, Header files, Asp, Bat, Asm(x86) only, Lua, Perl, Pascal, Php, Python, R, Ruby, Shell script, Tcl/Tk, Vhdl etc 3. Support Github. You can search/browse Github pages and download source code zip archive directly from Github 4. Support search symbols in the whole source code tree, this works like a “grep” command 5. Support jumping from symbol(function, class, global variable, struct, enum etc) to its definition and declaration 6. Support search in single source code file for any keywords. 7. Support list all the symbols in current file. 8. Support find functions who called current functions (C, C++only), similar to Cscope 9. Support find all the functions called by current functions (C, C++ only), similar to Cscope 10. Support find the class inheritance relationship (C++ and Java only) 11. Support download and reading Linux kernel sources 12. Support upload source codes directly from Wifi connections 13. Support download source codes from given URL. 14. Support iTunes to upload source codes 15. Support directly read sources code packaged in Tar, Tar.Gz and zip file format. 16. Support change Font Size and Font Family Name 17. Support no-wrap reading so that a line won’t be break down to multiple lines due to small screen. 18. Multiple code reading theme for reader to choose

Screenshots

Manual Reads3 screens
CodeInsight4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Manual Reads at none against CodeInsight's 1. Manual Reads also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). CodeInsight's advantage is review sentiment (100% vs 67%). On price, rating, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. CodeInsight sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Manual Reads asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.3 for Manual Reads against 4.3 for CodeInsight. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 6 and 3 respectively. Written reviews are what separate them: 67% of Manual Reads's written reviews are positive against 100% of CodeInsight's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Manual Reads ships an update every 3 weeks, CodeInsight every 2 weeks. Both last shipped on October 20, 2026.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Manual Reads versus CodeInsight: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterManual ReadsCodeInsight
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (6 ratings)4.3 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings6 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeksEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS15.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size47 MB10 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperNext Century Submetering Systems飞 龙

Customer experience

Manual Reads

All ratings6 ratings
Positive83.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative16.7%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

CodeInsight

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Manual Reads

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

CodeInsight

One-time1
  • Full funtional version$3.99

Questions

Is Manual Reads free?
Manual Reads is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CodeInsight free?
CodeInsight is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Manual Reads or CodeInsight?
Manual Reads and CodeInsight are both rated 4.3 out of 5 on the App Store, from 6 and 3 ratings respectively.
Do Manual Reads or CodeInsight have ads?
Neither Manual Reads nor CodeInsight shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Manual Reads or CodeInsight?
Manual Reads ships an update every 3 weeks, and CodeInsight every 2 weeks. Most recently, Manual Reads was updated on October 20, 2026 and CodeInsight on October 20, 2026.

Other comparisons