Comparison

特斯联App vs 熊猫吃短信2

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

特斯联App

Features
Read full description

future APP是由特斯联打造的一款用于智慧城市场景的移动端应用,提供蓝牙开门、远程开门、访客邀请等功能,帮助用户实现真正便捷的智慧城市生活。

About

熊猫吃短信2

This app uses machine learning to intelligently filter your text messages, categorizing them beyond just spam. It offers detailed classifications for financial, order, and weather-related messages, all processed offline on your device for enhanced privacy. Users can contribute to its learning by reporting misclassified messages.

Highlights
  • Machine learning SMS filtering
  • Offline processing
  • Detailed message categorization
  • User-contributed learning
  • Privacy-focused
Features
Read full description

广受欢迎的「熊猫吃短信」推出了 2.0 版本,使用新的机器学习模型架构,更加准确,也支持了更多的分类。 全面适配 iOS 16 的最新的短信分类,在正常短信、垃圾短信之外能够识别更加细致的短信分类:财务(银行信息、保险、理财、水电费)、订单(取件码、物流、订单状态、旅游出行)、运营商、天气等等。 熊猫吃短信创新性的使用 CoreML 机器学习框架在手机端离线拦截垃圾短信。我们不上传用户短信,拒绝云端识别。 我们依靠广大的用户群体主动向我们举报垃圾短信来建立机器学习的样本库。然后使用基于统计学的机器学习算法从百万条各类短信样本中学习而成。无需用户配置任何关键词,它通过识别一个短信的语义特征,自己就可以精准的判断收到的短信是正常短信、公益短信、交易记录还是广告骚扰短信等等。 如果熊猫有判断失误的时候,大家可以在 App 里面投喂新的短信样本帮助熊猫进化,喂养越多熊猫越聪明。 ** 隐私条款:熊猫会收集哪些信息?** 「熊猫吃短信」不会收集您的任何信息,更不会上传您的短信内容。如果您自愿向熊猫提交短信样本,那么会收集脱敏后的短信文本以及一个您标注是否是垃圾短信的数字,仅此两项数据。 https://baye.tech/privacy-policy.html 使用条款 https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Screenshots

特斯联App4 screens
熊猫吃短信24 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 特斯联App at none against 熊猫吃短信2's 2. 特斯联App also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 16.0). 熊猫吃短信2's advantage is update cadence (every 9 days vs every 6 weeks). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 熊猫吃短信2 sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $0.49 per month. 特斯联App asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

特斯联App ships an update every 6 weeks, 熊猫吃短信2 every 9 days. The most recent releases landed on September 18, 2026 and September 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
特斯联App versus 熊猫吃短信2: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter特斯联App熊猫吃短信2
PriceFreeFree
Rating—4.6 (243 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—71.1% of reviews
Number of ratings—243 — better
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeksEvery 9 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
Monetization—Free with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS11.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size187 MB15 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperCEL Terminus(Shanghai) Information Technology Co., LtdEarly Moon, LLC

Bugs and requests

特斯联App

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

熊猫吃短信2

Reported bugs

5 issues
  • Custom rules not syncing across devices
  • Subscription invalid after changing region
  • iOS 18 functionality not working
  • Software logic bug with SMS redirection
  • Old version UI appears after upgrade

Requested features

8 requests
  • Custom rule migration or iCloud sync
  • Batch import keywords
  • Permanent in-app purchase option
  • Regular expression support
  • iCloud sync for custom rules
Show 3 more
  • English version for English SMS filtering
  • Customizable rule examples
  • Android version

In-app purchases

None

特斯联App

No in-app purchases

2 purchases

熊猫吃短信2

Subscriptions2
  • 订阅机器学习模型(按月)7 Days trial$0.491 Month
  • 订阅机器学习模型(按年)7 Days trial$0.991 Year

Questions

Is 特斯联App free?
特斯联App is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 熊猫吃短信2 free?
熊猫吃短信2 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do 特斯联App or 熊猫吃短信2 have ads?
Neither 特斯联App nor 熊猫吃短信2 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 特斯联App or 熊猫吃短信2?
特斯联App ships an update every 6 weeks, and 熊猫吃短信2 every 9 days. Most recently, 特斯联App was updated on September 18, 2026 and 熊猫吃短信2 on September 24, 2026.

Other comparisons