Comparison

SplitFast Timing vs Split Second

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SplitFast Timing

Features
Read full description

The SplitFast timing App is the companion to the SplitFast athletics timing system. The app connects to SplitFast wireless timing gates to record sprint and middle distance times with intermediate splits. - Accurate timing using split and finish gates - Supports configurable sprint distances - Real-time result capture per athlete - Export and review timing results On iPad, the larger screen allows you to manage and time multiple lanes simultaneously, making it ideal for group training sessions and competitions.

About

Split Second

This timing app helps cross country coaches track runner splits during races with millisecond precision. It allows for configurable splits, management of multiple rosters, and offline functionality for efficient race day use. Results can be exported as PDF reports.

Highlights
  • Single stopwatch for all runners
  • Millisecond precision split recording
  • Configurable splits per runner
  • Multiple roster management
  • Quick roster loading
  • Export results as PDF
  • Offline functionality
Features
Read full description

Split Second is a powerful timing app designed for cross country coaches to track runner splits during races. KEY FEATURES: • Single stopwatch controls timing for all runners • Record individual split times with millisecond precision • Configurable splits (1-8 per runner) for any race distance • Manage multiple rosters (Varsity Boys, Girls, JV, etc.) • Quick roster loading for race day efficiency • Export race results as PDF reports • Compact, mobile-friendly interface optimized for outdoor use • Works completely offline - no internet required • Delete individual runners for

Screenshots

SplitFast Timing4 screens
Split Second4 screens

Verdict

The call

SplitFast Timing and Split Second are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
SplitFast Timing versus Split Second: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSplitFast TimingSplit Second
PriceFreeFree
Rating—5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Number of ratings—2 — better
Update frequencyEvery 8 days—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Free
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.015.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size118 MB33 MB
Age rating12+4+
DeveloperSplitfast Pty LtdJackson Dawson

In-app purchases

None

SplitFast Timing

No in-app purchases

None

Split Second

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SplitFast Timing free?
SplitFast Timing is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Split Second free?
Split Second is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do SplitFast Timing or Split Second have ads?
Neither SplitFast Timing nor Split Second shows ads.

Other comparisons