Comparison

E Star vs 久趣背单词

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

E Star

Features
Read full description

E Star 为您带来电子学习和课堂参与的好处。

About

久趣背单词

Features
Read full description

我们致力于帮助小学阶段的孩子轻松背单词。 按时间规划,科学记忆,每天进步一点。权威词库,多样题型,贴近课堂教材,立足教学大纲,多个版本教材精研覆盖。 【自动续费VIP会员】 -- VIP会员权益:练习和错题集特权,并解锁全部课程。 -- 订阅周期:12个月(VIP会员连续包年产品)。 -- 订阅价格:以iAP申请信息为准,例如连续包年产品每年168元。 -- 付款:用户确认购买并付款后记入iTunes账户。 -- 取消续订:如需取消续订,请在当前订阅周期到期前24小时以前,手动在iTunes/Apple ID设置管理中关闭自动续订功能。 -- 续订:苹果iTunes账户会在到期前24小时内扣费,扣费成功后订阅周期顺延一个订阅周期。 -- 隐私政策:https://qkids.com/pages/privacy/qkidsSZ/cn -- 用户协议:https://qkids.com/pages/contract/qkidsSZ/cn -- 自动续费会员服务协议:https://qkids.com/word-privacy/

Screenshots

E Star4 screens
久趣背单词4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: E Star at none against 久趣背单词's 1. On price, ads, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 久趣背单词 sells 1 in-app purchase, starting at $24.99 per year. E Star asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard1 real difference · 5 level
E Star versus 久趣背单词: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterE Star久趣背单词
PriceFreeFree
Update frequency—Every 7 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS8.0 — better9.0
Further details — not scored
Size38 MB64 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperWiseman Education Limited深圳久趣科技有限公司

In-app purchases

None

E Star

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

久趣背单词

Subscriptions1
  • 年卡会员$24.991 Year

Questions

Is E Star free?
E Star is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 久趣背单词 free?
久趣背单词 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do E Star or 久趣背单词 have ads?
Neither E Star nor 久趣背单词 shows ads.

Other comparisons