Comparison

SimpleFloatingClock vs 石头阅读

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SimpleFloatingClock

This utility app offers a stopwatch, timer, and alarm clock with a new-skeuomorphic design. It's ideal for quick timing needs, daily tasks, and setting important alerts.

Highlights
  • Stopwatch functionality
  • Daily timer
  • Alarm clock
  • Skeuomorphic design
Features
Read full description

使用新拟物设计风格,一款包含秒杀计时,日常计时、闹钟的app。

About

石头阅读

Features
Read full description

石头阅读,点滴灵感的珍贵存储地。这款App是你随时随地捕捉创意、记录灵感的理想伴侣。简洁直观的界面设计使得记录变得愉悦轻松,轻轻一点,即可将灵感永久封存。 石头阅读让创意无拘无束地流淌,支持文字形式的记录方式。无论是在旅途中的灵感闪现,还是在日常生活的点滴体验,都能在石头笔记中找到安身之地。轻松查找所需。

Screenshots

SimpleFloatingClock3 screens
石头阅读4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 石头阅读 at 67% against SimpleFloatingClock's 0%. 石头阅读 also leads on rating (4.5 vs 1.0) and ratings volume (164 vs 1). SimpleFloatingClock's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and iOS requirement (10.0 vs 12.0). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

石头阅读 holds the better App Store score, 4.5 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 石头阅读 has 164 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of SimpleFloatingClock's written reviews are positive against 67% of 石头阅读's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 3, 2026 and November 4, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
SimpleFloatingClock versus 石头阅读: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSimpleFloatingClock石头阅读
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)4.5 (164 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews66.7% of reviews — better
Number of ratings1164 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeksEvery 2 weeks
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS10.0 — better12.0
Further details — not scored
Size67 MB73 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer引量科技磊 于

Customer experience

SimpleFloatingClock

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

石头阅读

All ratings83 ratings
Positive90.4%
Neutral3.6%
Negative6.0%
Written reviews15 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

In-app purchases

None

SimpleFloatingClock

No in-app purchases

None

石头阅读

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SimpleFloatingClock free?
SimpleFloatingClock is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 石头阅读 free?
石头阅读 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, SimpleFloatingClock or 石头阅读?
石头阅读 is rated higher. SimpleFloatingClock averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 石头阅读 averages 4.5 from 164 ratings.
Do SimpleFloatingClock or 石头阅读 have ads?
石头阅读 shows ads; SimpleFloatingClock does not.
Which is updated more often, SimpleFloatingClock or 石头阅读?
SimpleFloatingClock ships an update every 2 weeks, and 石头阅读 every 2 weeks. Most recently, SimpleFloatingClock was updated on November 3, 2026 and 石头阅读 on November 4, 2026.

Other comparisons