Comparison

原始之争 vs 怪物自动精灵

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

原始之争

Features
Read full description

这是一款战争策略手游 在游戏中,您将带领一个部落 培养头目,战胜其他部落

About

怪物自动精灵

Features
Read full description

融合Roguelike随机性与自走棋策略深度,体验每周焕新的卡牌博弈。在随机怪物与道具中构建最强阵容,灵活站位击败强敌。支持PVP对抗与合作模式,剧情引导快速上手,解锁强力建筑奠定胜局。 ‌详细描述:‌ 【核心玩法】 • ‌极简肉鸽+自走棋‌:告别繁琐操作,专注策略搭配。每一局都是全新的挑战,每一次选择都至关重要。 • ‌每周随机卡池‌:卡池每周刷新,保持游戏新鲜感。从海量随机怪物与道具中,筛选并组合出你的专属强力队伍。 【策略深度】 • ‌灵活站位艺术‌:不仅要看数值,更要看位置。通过调整英雄站位,触发羁绊效果,以弱胜强,击败远超自身实力的敌人。 • ‌建筑养成系统‌:积累经验解锁更多强力建筑,它们将成为你赢得最终胜利的关键法宝,为队伍提供持久增益。 【多元模式】 • ‌PVP/PVE双修‌:既可与其他玩家实时合作或对抗,检验策略极限;也可在剧情模式中与AI对战,轻松上手,磨练技巧。 • ‌快速入门体验‌:精心设计的教程与剧情模式,让新手也能迅速掌握核心机制,享受策略乐趣。

Screenshots

原始之争4 screens
怪物自动精灵4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 原始之争 at none against 怪物自动精灵's shown. 原始之争 also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 7 level
原始之争 versus 怪物自动精灵: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter原始之争怪物自动精灵
PriceFreeFree
Rating—5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—91.7% of reviews
Number of ratings—2 — better
Update frequency—Every 2 months
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size64 MB23 MB
Age rating4+9+
Developer琼瑶 蔡梦玲 汪

In-app purchases

None

原始之争

No in-app purchases

None

怪物自动精灵

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 原始之争 free?
原始之争 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 怪物自动精灵 free?
怪物自动精灵 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do 原始之争 or 怪物自动精灵 have ads?
怪物自动精灵 shows ads; 原始之争 does not.

Other comparisons