Comparison

Fabula for SwiftUI vs CodeWiki

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Fabula for SwiftUI

Explore narrative construction and code organization using fabula and syuzhet concepts. This app serves as a personal project to learn SwiftUI, offering code collections and fostering developer community interaction. It aims to help users understand SwiftUI's declarative approach for cross-platform development.

Highlights
  • Narrative construction concepts (fabula & syuzhet)
  • SwiftUI code collections
  • Declarative UI development learning
  • Cross-platform development (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS)
  • Developer community sharing
  • Regular code updates
Features
Read full description

The formalism used the concepts of fabula and syuzhet as a way to develop narrative construction or classified materials and compositions into fabula and syuzhet, respectively. The totality of microscopic events listed in causality was called a fabula, and the narrative arrangement of these motifs in an artistic way was called a syuzhet. This app is a personal project to learn the technical ingredients of SwiftUI and derive creative results. SwiftUI is a user interface toolkit that can develop applications in a declarative manner. This is a modern development method that communicates to iOS how you want the user interface to behave and finds out how users perform when interacting with the interface. In addition, SwiftUI can develop macOS, watchOS, and tvOS with the same code as well as iOS development. The most appealing thing for me personally is that it is easy to learn and that the code is concise, making it easy for beginners to understand. I hope this project will help everyone, including myself, to understand SwiftUI. The code of this project will be updated regularly. You can share and communicate with developers around the world through the Fabula app. We always look forward to the participation of developers.

About

CodeWiki

Learn Swift programming with a curated collection of tutorials, code examples, and tips. This app aims to help aspiring iOS developers write more secure and efficient code.

Highlights
  • Swift code examples
  • Programming tutorials
  • Secure coding tips
  • Efficient code guidance
  • iOS development focus
Features
Read full description

It's never been easier to start your journey as an iOS developer! With CodeWiki, you have access to a collection of tutorials, code examples, and Swift tips that are intended to help you write more secure and efficient code. Additional Information: - Terms of Use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/ - This App has no relationship with Apple, we only use its programming language (Swift) to help you on your journey. - Swift and iOS are registered trademarks of Apple Inc.

Screenshots

Fabula for SwiftUI4 screens
CodeWiki3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Fabula for SwiftUI at none against CodeWiki's 4. Fabula for SwiftUI also leads on ratings volume (123 vs 1) and iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). CodeWiki's advantage is rating (5.0 vs 4.8). On price, review sentiment, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. CodeWiki sells 4 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per month. Fabula for SwiftUI asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

CodeWiki holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Fabula for SwiftUI has 123 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 98% of Fabula for SwiftUI's written reviews are positive against 100% of CodeWiki's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Fabula for SwiftUI ships an update fortnightly, CodeWiki every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 15, 2026 and October 9, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
Fabula for SwiftUI versus CodeWiki: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFabula for SwiftUICodeWiki
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.8 (123 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews97.6% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings123 — better1
Update frequencyFortnightlyEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod, Mac — betteriPhone, iPad, Mac
Requires iOS15.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size22 MB10 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperGyeong Seop NoFelipe Grosze Nipper de Oliveira

Customer experience

Fabula for SwiftUI

All ratings123 ratings
Positive95.9%
Neutral1.6%
Negative2.4%
Written reviews41 reviews
Positive97.6%
Neutral0.0%
Negative2.4%

CodeWiki

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews2 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Fabula for SwiftUI

No in-app purchases

4 purchases

CodeWiki

Subscriptions4
  • 1 Month$2.991 Month
  • Plus (3 Months)$6.993 Months
  • 6 Months$12.996 Months
Show 1 more
  • 1 Year7 Days trial$24.991 Year

Questions

Is Fabula for SwiftUI free?
Fabula for SwiftUI is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CodeWiki free?
CodeWiki is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Fabula for SwiftUI or CodeWiki?
CodeWiki is rated higher. Fabula for SwiftUI averages 4.8 out of 5 from 123 ratings, while CodeWiki averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Fabula for SwiftUI or CodeWiki have ads?
Neither Fabula for SwiftUI nor CodeWiki shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Fabula for SwiftUI or CodeWiki?
Fabula for SwiftUI ships an update fortnightly, and CodeWiki every 2 weeks. Most recently, Fabula for SwiftUI was updated on October 15, 2026 and CodeWiki on October 9, 2026.

Other comparisons