Comparison

个人收藏 vs 樱桃助手

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

个人收藏

This app provides storage space for your selected albums and videos. It offers various subscription plans for extended storage and features. Users can manage their subscriptions and auto-renewal settings through their iTunes account.

Highlights
  • Photo and video storage
  • Subscription plans
  • Auto-renewal management
  • Privacy policy
  • EULA
Features
Read full description

珍选相册和视频的保存空间 订阅说明: - 会员订阅费有三种不同的方案 解锁周会员:¥18 解锁月会员:¥38 解锁季会员:¥88 - 订阅付款将在确认购买时由iTunes帐户收取。 - 订阅类型为自动续期续订,取消需在本期结束前至少24小时关闭自动续订。 - 账户将在本期结束前的24小时内收取续费,并确定续约费用。 - 用户可以管理订阅,并且可以在购买之后在itunes账户设置中关闭自动续订。 - 隐私政策:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DV0ZNd1JxZm54WlVr - EULA:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DV3Z5THNLSWtFVWZ3

About

樱桃助手

This utility app offers a versatile media player with local file management, a web browser, and streaming capabilities. It also includes a smart toolbox with features like QR code generation and cross-device file transfer, plus a floating network speed monitor.

Highlights
  • Local file privacy management
  • Full-network speed browser
  • Video streaming player
  • Smart toolbox (QR generator, file transfer)
  • Floating network speed display
  • Cross-device file transfer
Read full description

樱桃助手,一款多功能视频文件播放器辅助工具。樱桃助手提供了三个核心媒体文件工具,包括本地文件隐私管理、全网极速浏览器和视频流媒体本地播放器。 除此之外,我们还集成了强大的智能工具箱,其中包括但不限于二维码生成器、网页保存器、隐私密码管理、跨设备文件传输、自定义在线播放、书签历史管理和网页关键词查找等功能。 使用樱桃助手时,用户常常会面临一些烦恼,例如不知道消耗了多少流量,当前的网速如何,以及网络环境是否良好。为此,我们特别开发了一款悬浮网速显示器工具。通过这个工具,用户可以在使用浏览器冲浪、或其他需要网络连接的应用时,通过灵动岛的悬浮挂件样式实时监控当前网络状况,让用户一目了然。 我们非常欢迎樱桃助手的所有用户在使用过程中提出任何想法和建议。在我们看来,每一位用户都是我们APP的重要主人,您的反馈将帮助我们不断改进和完善樱桃助手的功能。 樱桃助手为用户准备了尊贵的会员版本 订阅会员版本规则如下, 连续包周¥9/周卡 连续包月¥19/月卡 连续包季¥29/季卡 连续半年卡¥39/半年卡 连续年卡¥58/年卡 实际费用可能会转换为当地货币,具体取决于您所居住的国家/地区。 确认订购后,付款将从您的iTunes账户中扣除。 订阅会自动续订,除非在当前期间结束前至少24小时关闭了自动续订。在当前期限结束前的24小时内,将向账户收取续订费用,并将提供续订费用。 订阅可以由用户管理。购买后,可以在用户的“账户设置”中关闭。 详细请参考《用户协议》、《隐私政策》 用户会员协议:https://www.22cha.com/appcomcontent/yt/yt-user.html 隐私权政策:https://www.22cha.com/appcomcontent/yt/yt-privacy.html 技术支持:https://www.22cha.com/appcomcontent/yt/yt-help.html

Screenshots

个人收藏2 screens
樱桃助手4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: 个人收藏 at 2 against 樱桃助手's —. On price, rating, ratings volume and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 个人收藏 sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per 7 days and 樱桃助手 sells 5 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per 7 days. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for 个人收藏 against 5.0 for 樱桃助手. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 2 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 8 level
个人收藏 versus 樱桃助手: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter个人收藏樱桃助手
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings)
Number of ratings12 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 days—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFreemiumFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPod — better—
Requires iOS13.012.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size7 MB39 MB
Age rating4+17+
Developer永胜 李muhongnet

In-app purchases

3 purchases

个人收藏

Subscriptions3
  • 周会员$2.997 Days
  • 月会员$5.991 Month
  • 季会员$13.493 Months
5 purchases

樱桃助手

Subscriptions5
  • 樱桃会员周卡$0.997 Days
  • 樱桃会员月卡$2.991 Month
  • 樱桃会员季卡$3.993 Months
Show 2 more
  • 樱桃会员半年卡$5.996 Months
  • 樱桃会员年卡$7.991 Year

Questions

Is 个人收藏 free?
个人收藏 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 樱桃助手 free?
樱桃助手 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 个人收藏 or 樱桃助手?
个人收藏 and 樱桃助手 are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 1 and 2 ratings respectively.

Other comparisons