海铁联运 vs eShiper发件网
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
海铁联运
Read full descriptionHide full description
海铁联运作为一家由港口、铁路、航运、物流四方共同出资组建的经营主体和服务平台，公司主要负责海铁联运市场拓展、资源整合、模式创新，协同各方共同推进海铁联运公共服务平台建设，逐步完善海铁联运发展软环境。在业务流程上，建立一次托运、一次计费、全程负责的服务体系，为客户提供铁路货运站与上海港区之间门到门一站式服务。 目前公司主要运营苏州、湖州、常州、合肥、成都等地往返上海芦潮港铁路中心站的铁路班列，并负责安排落实从芦潮港铁路中心站到上海洋山港区的集卡短驳运输。公司依托互联网技术搭建海铁联运协同管理系统，提供各内地代理在线委托业务、查询运输信息、发送相关装箱信息。
eShiper发件网
Read full descriptionHide full description
发件网旨在为用户提供价格信息，物流信息，订单信息等信息查询服务
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is device support: 海铁联运 at 3 against eShiper发件网's —. On price, in-app purchases and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | 海铁联运 | eShiper发件网 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 8 months | — |
| Ads | No | — |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | — |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 33 MB | 38 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | 上海港海铁联运有限公司 | ALL GLOBAL LOGISTICS (BEIJING) CO LTD |
In-app purchases
海铁联运
No in-app purchases
eShiper发件网
No in-app purchases
