Comparison

E电检修 vs CubeBox

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

E电检修

Features
Read full description

设备管理与检修记录,更清晰直观的图形分析,同时支持日常数据导出以及操作日志管理,更便捷!

About

CubeBox

Organize and track your belongings with comprehensive details like purchase info and warranty status. Manage digital products, vehicles, and collectibles with an elegant, private interface. Data is securely stored locally or on iCloud.

Highlights
  • Categories and purchase info tracking
  • Warranty detail management
  • Digital product tracking
  • Vehicle and collectible cataloging
  • Elegant and aesthetic interface
  • Secure local and iCloud storage
Features
Read full description

Functional Highlights - Comprehensive Features: Master them all including categories, purchase info, warranty details - All-inclusive Tracking: Easily manage digital products, vehicles, collectibles, fashion items - Elegant Icons: Carefully curated visual elements for practical yet aesthetic interfaces - Secure & Reliable: Data stored exclusively on your device and iCloud, 100% private Usage Scenarios - Digital Devices: Track purchase dates, warranty status, and usage insights for phones, laptops, cameras - Vehicles: Maintain service records and vital info for cars, e-bikes, bicycles - Collectibles: Catalog detailed information for blind boxes, figurines, toys Core Principles - User-Centric: Continuous optimization for exceptional user experience - Privacy First: Your data security is our top priority with strictly local/iCloud storage

Screenshots

E电检修3 screens
CubeBox4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: E电检修 at none against CubeBox's 1. E电检修 also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). CubeBox's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and update cadence (every 10 days vs every 7 months). On price and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. CubeBox sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. E电检修 asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

E电检修 ships an update every 7 months, CubeBox every 10 days. The most recent releases landed on October 25, 2026 and October 28, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
E电检修 versus CubeBox: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterE电检修CubeBox
PriceFreeFree
Rating—4.8 (33 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—92.9% of reviews
Number of ratings—33 — better
Update frequencyEvery 7 monthsEvery 10 days — better
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
Monetization—Free with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS15.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size22 MB32 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer琪卿 罗阳 张

Bugs and requests

E电检修

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

CubeBox

Reported bugs

2 issues
  • Issues with the labeling/tagging functionality
  • Inconsistencies in recording item warranty periods

Requested features

8 requests
  • Add custom icon upload feature
  • Implement image upload to track item history
  • Add support for recording consumable items
  • Provide option to record resale/transfer value
  • Improve sorting and filtering options
Show 3 more
  • Introduce a notes/comments feature
  • Support for multiple currencies
  • Automatic product categorization using AI

In-app purchases

None

E电检修

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

CubeBox

One-time1
  • 永久会员$9.99

Questions

Is E电检修 free?
E电检修 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CubeBox free?
CubeBox is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do E电检修 or CubeBox have ads?
E电检修 shows ads; CubeBox does not.
Which is updated more often, E电检修 or CubeBox?
E电检修 ships an update every 7 months, and CubeBox every 10 days. Most recently, E电检修 was updated on October 25, 2026 and CubeBox on October 28, 2026.

Other comparisons