Comparison

FACES intervention vs OxMET

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

FACES intervention

This app helps users improve emotional recognition skills by focusing on facial cues and personal emotional experiences. It uses interactive questions and discussions to teach participants to identify emotions in others.

Highlights
  • Facial cue recognition training
  • Personal emotional experience integration
  • Interactive question-based learning
  • Elaborate discussion modules
  • Therapist-participant interaction
Features
Read full description

FACES Intervention aims to improve two main skills that are theorised to be the crux of how emotions are recognised in others. According to the literature, the two main ways in which we determine emotion in others is by: 1) attending to and understanding important emotional cues and 2) having experienced that emotion ourselves; therefore referring to our own similar emotional experiences. Consequently the goals of this treatment program are: i. To teach participants to attend to facial features/regions that are most important for determining emotion (eye region: brows and lids; and mouth). ii. To use personal emotional experience to relate to and identify emotions in others. There are two main components to this program. One component uses a series of questions to familiarise participants with facial expressions. The other piece uses elaborate discussion to help the participant relate to the emotions being discussed, through awareness of their own personal emotional experiences. Both components of this program are interwoven and require a lot of interaction between the participant and the therapist.

About

OxMET

This tool provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. It is automatically scored and evaluated against age-adjusted norms, generating a visual snapshot report for clinical use.

Highlights
  • Ecologically valid assessment
  • Naturalistic shopping scenario
  • Automatic scoring
  • Age-adjusted norms
  • Visual snapshot report
  • Standardized and validated
Features
Read full description

OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke). The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.

Screenshots

FACES intervention3 screens
OxMET4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: OxMET at 11.0 against FACES intervention's 16.4. On price, rating, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 1.0 for FACES intervention against 1.0 for OxMET. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

FACES intervention ships an update every 29 months, OxMET every 22 months. Both last shipped on October 5, 2026.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
FACES intervention versus OxMET: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFACES interventionOxMET
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (2 ratings)1.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 29 monthsEvery 22 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.411.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size41 MB111 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperObex Technologies LtdUniversity of Oxford

Customer experience

FACES intervention

All ratings2 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

OxMET

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

FACES intervention

No in-app purchases

None

OxMET

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is FACES intervention free?
FACES intervention is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is OxMET free?
OxMET is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, FACES intervention or OxMET?
FACES intervention and OxMET are both rated 1.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 2 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do FACES intervention or OxMET have ads?
Neither FACES intervention nor OxMET shows ads.
Which is updated more often, FACES intervention or OxMET?
FACES intervention ships an update every 29 months, and OxMET every 22 months. Most recently, FACES intervention was updated on October 5, 2026 and OxMET on October 5, 2026.

Other comparisons