Sinjab Academy vs ToricTrouble
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Sinjab Academy
This app provides ophthalmology education for eye care professionals. Access structured courses, recorded lectures, and live sessions. Engage with a study companion for interactive learning and risk assessment tools.
- Structured courses and lectures
- Live session access
- Interactive study companion
- Refractive surgery risk assessment
- Master classes and curriculum
- Certificate management
- Event notifications
Read full descriptionHide full description
Sinjab Academy is an online academy for eye care professionals. Learn from leading ophthalmologists through structured courses, recorded lectures and live sessions, wherever you practise. With the app you can: - Follow your courses: watch lectures, pick up where you left off, and take the quizzes. - Join your live sessions from the app. - Ask Razeen, your study companion, about a lecture or topic, and turn what you learn into notes, flashcards, clinical cases and practice quizzes. - Use SARSA, the refractive surgery risk assessment, and keep your assessments in one place. - Explore the master classes, the MIDAD curriculum and the faculty behind every course. - Keep your certificates, each with its own verification link. - See your event registrations, announcements and notifications. - Get help from our support team without leaving the app. Sign in with your Sinjab Academy account. Questions? Write to support@sinjabacademy.org.
ToricTrouble
Read full descriptionHide full description
Toric Trouble works up the outcome after a toric intraocular lens. The app calculates backwards: from biometry, implanted lens and subjective refraction it determines which of the three does not fit the other two. FOUR POSITIONS • Lens — which lens is actually at work? The main clinical question. • Refraction — what refraction was to be expected? Turning the axis simulates a misaligned lens. • Cornea — which cornea fits lens and refraction? Comparing it with the keratometry is the diagnosis. • Plausibility — all three checked against each other, naming the ghost astigmatism: what none of the three explains. FURTHER FEATURES • A recommendation where to rotate, what residual cylinder would remain at best — and whether an exchange is the better choice • Axis diagrams with uncertainty wedges from the actual measurement tolerances: cornea 0.30 D vectorial, refraction 0.25 D, read-off axis ±3° • Keratometric index selectable in four steps: 1.3375 (Javal), 1.332 (Zeiss), 1.3295 (Kooijman), 1.3281 (Liou & Brennan) • Effective lens position from the postoperatively measured anterior chamber depth instead of a prediction — this removes the largest uncertainty from the calculation • Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) from pre- and postoperative keratometry • Plausibility check on every entry: impossible values block the calculation rather than yielding a result that looks like any other • Complete manual inside the app, in three languages CALCULATION CORE The basis is the Castrop formula, developed with Prof. Achim Langenbucher, Saarland University, and published peer-reviewed: Langenbucher A et al. Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0252102 Langenbucher A et al. The Castrop formula for calculation of toric intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;259(11):3321–3331 Both papers are linked inside the app, directly below the result. Where the app goes beyond what is published, it says so and describes the calculation path in full in the bundled manual. All calculation runs on the device, in C99 compiled into the binary. No account, no sign-in, no network, no advertising, no data collection. German, English and Italian. For ophthalmologists and other eye care professionals. Not a medical device; responsibility for every clinical decision remains with the user.
Screenshots
Verdict
Sinjab Academy and ToricTrouble are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Sinjab Academy | ToricTrouble |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (5 ratings) — better | — |
| Number of ratings | 5 — better | — |
| Update frequency | Every 3 weeks | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 16.4 — better | 16.6 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 53 MB | 5 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Alaa Senjab | Peter Hoffmann |
In-app purchases
Sinjab Academy
No in-app purchases
ToricTrouble
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Sinjab Academy free?
Is ToricTrouble free?
Do Sinjab Academy or ToricTrouble have ads?
Other comparisons















