GPUScore vs Material Nutrient
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
GPUScore
Read full descriptionHide full description
GPUScore: Sacred Path is a graphics benchmark suited for a whole range of devices, from high-end mobile devices to mid-tier desktop and laptop devices. The story is a continuation from The Expedition, and precedes the one from Relic of Life. This benchmark employs latest 3D graphics rendering features and techniques used in video games, such as: - Temporal Anti-Aliasing (TAA) - Ground Truth Ambient Occlusion - Variable Rate Shading - Volumetric Lighting - etc. The application contains two Official benchmarks that submit results to Powerboard 4.0 online platform for comparison. These results can be compared with other results coming from different users. - Official: The main benchmark that uses 2540Γ1440 (QHD) rendering resolution - Official Native: Uses the same content and settings as Official, but uses deviceβs display resolution as the rendering resolution. Only available on mobile devices Additionally the application contains custom benchmark mode, which uses the same content as Official, but allows users to change settings from the default ones used in Official. Experience mode is available for previewing the benchmark content in a smooth way.
Material Nutrient
Read full descriptionHide full description
This is the useful application to search ingredients nutrition The app has the following main features: 1. Search ingredients 2. Category List 3. Ingredients List 4. Favorite List 5. Related News 6. Setting: change language, app info, ... ........ And have more attractive functions/features will be developed in the near future. You need supports/suggestions. Please contact: Phone/Zalo/Viber/Telegram: +8490 886 93 96 Email: shightech088@gmail.com
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: GPUScore at none against Material Nutrient's shown. Material Nutrient's advantage is update cadence (every 2 months vs every 20 months) and iOS requirement (12.0 vs 18.5). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
GPUScore ships an update every 20 months, Material Nutrient every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 8, 2026 and October 16, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | GPUScore | Material Nutrient |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 20 months | Every 2 months β better |
| Ads | No β better | Yes |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad, iPod β better |
| Requires iOS | 18.5 | 12.0 β better |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 590 MB | 41 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Basemark | Hung Nguyen Kim |
In-app purchases
GPUScore
No in-app purchases
Material Nutrient
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is GPUScore free?
Is Material Nutrient free?
Do GPUScore or Material Nutrient have ads?
Which is updated more often, GPUScore or Material Nutrient?
Other comparisons















