Comparison

GPUScore vs Material Nutrient

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

GPUScore

Read full description

GPUScore: Sacred Path is a graphics benchmark suited for a whole range of devices, from high-end mobile devices to mid-tier desktop and laptop devices. The story is a continuation from The Expedition, and precedes the one from Relic of Life. This benchmark employs latest 3D graphics rendering features and techniques used in video games, such as: - Temporal Anti-Aliasing (TAA) - Ground Truth Ambient Occlusion - Variable Rate Shading - Volumetric Lighting - etc. The application contains two Official benchmarks that submit results to Powerboard 4.0 online platform for comparison. These results can be compared with other results coming from different users. - Official: The main benchmark that uses 2540Γ—1440 (QHD) rendering resolution - Official Native: Uses the same content and settings as Official, but uses device’s display resolution as the rendering resolution. Only available on mobile devices Additionally the application contains custom benchmark mode, which uses the same content as Official, but allows users to change settings from the default ones used in Official. Experience mode is available for previewing the benchmark content in a smooth way.

About

Material Nutrient

Features
Read full description

This is the useful application to search ingredients nutrition The app has the following main features: 1. Search ingredients 2. Category List 3. Ingredients List 4. Favorite List 5. Related News 6. Setting: change language, app info, ... ........ And have more attractive functions/features will be developed in the near future. You need supports/suggestions. Please contact: Phone/Zalo/Viber/Telegram: +8490 886 93 96 Email: shightech088@gmail.com

Screenshots

GPUScore4 screens
Material Nutrient4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: GPUScore at none against Material Nutrient's shown. Material Nutrient's advantage is update cadence (every 2 months vs every 20 months) and iOS requirement (12.0 vs 18.5). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS

CostPrice Β· In-app purchases Β· Ads Β· Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

GPUScore ships an update every 20 months, Material Nutrient every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 8, 2026 and October 16, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences Β· 3 level
GPUScore versus Material Nutrient: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterGPUScoreMaterial Nutrient
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 20 monthsEvery 2 months β€” better
AdsNo β€” betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod β€” better
Requires iOS18.512.0 β€” better
Further details β€” not scored
Size590 MB41 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperBasemarkHung Nguyen Kim

In-app purchases

None

GPUScore

No in-app purchases

None

Material Nutrient

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is GPUScore free?
GPUScore is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Material Nutrient free?
Material Nutrient is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do GPUScore or Material Nutrient have ads?
Material Nutrient shows ads; GPUScore does not.
Which is updated more often, GPUScore or Material Nutrient?
GPUScore ships an update every 20 months, and Material Nutrient every 2 months. Most recently, GPUScore was updated on October 8, 2026 and Material Nutrient on October 16, 2026.

Other comparisons