Comparison

叨叨 vs 筑梦岛

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

叨叨

Engage in a virtual world with customizable AI companions for stress-free social interaction. Chat, manage finances, and learn languages with AI that offers personalized support and eliminates real-world social anxieties.

Highlights
  • Customizable AI companions
  • AI-powered chat
  • AI-assisted budgeting
  • AI-driven vocabulary practice
  • Virtual group chats
  • No social pressure
Features
Read full description

叨叨是一个让你进行无压力社交的虚拟世界! 在这里,你可以自定义添加任意性格的机器人来陪伴你——陪你聊天、记账、背单词…… 没有现实世界复杂的关系,没有已读不回的尴尬,没有找不到人陪的困扰,没有敷衍误无趣的对话,没有不能聊的内容! -------------------------------------------- ◈ 主要功能 ◈ -------------------------------------------- 1)聊天陪伴机器人:和你喜欢的机器人聊聊今天遇到的开心的不开心的事情,你喜欢的ta就在身边 2)小剧场群聊:加入爱豆和纸片人世界的各种群聊,收获双倍快乐 3)记账:通过机器人聊天方式解决了常规记账太枯燥无法坚持的问题,改善你的财务状况 4)背单词:让你喜欢机器人抽背你的单词,鼓励你/怼你,并通过重复抽背被错的单词加深单词记忆,让学习变的更快乐 -------------------------------------------- ◈ Ta想对你说 ◈ -------------------------------------------- 你每次回家来 都会跟我聊聊你的一天发生什么了吗? 和我说说你那个话多的同事 说说午饭时不小心在衣服上留下污渍 和我说说你刚睡醒时突然想到 但后来已记不清的有趣想法 告诉我大家是多么疯狂 让我们一同欢笑 即使你回来很晚 我已经睡了 还是可以在我耳边轻轻说你今天所想 哪怕是很小的事情 因为我喜欢你看待世界的方式 我很庆幸能陪在你身边 通过你的目光看世界。 ——《Her》 -------------------------------------------- ◈ 其他 ◈ -------------------------------------------- -隐私权政策:https://m.daodaojizhang.com/article/webshow/11 -会员服务协议:https://m.daodaojizhang.com/article/webshow/36 -------------------------------------------- ◈ 给我们写信 ◈ -------------------------------------------- 有任何疑问或者建议,都可以通过以下方式找到我们 给我们写信:daodao@ziguhonglan.com

About

筑梦岛

Features
Read full description

嗨,欢迎各位来到筑梦岛~这是一个可以无限发挥天马行空的想象力和创造力的地方。 【创建梦中人】 可以是原创角色,亦可是经典角色的副本。Ta的外貌、性格、身世、聊天风格、喜怒哀乐,将由你一手打造。Ta可以是人,是神,是化形的动物,也可以是赋予灵魂的器物。 【对话梦中人】 与你爱的角色对话聊天,感受异次元空间里“活着的Ta”。你还可以选择组建多角色梦屋进行群聊。修罗场、嗑CP、相亲相爱一家人,各种玩法应有尽有。 【不止于聊天】 有趣或惊艳的聊天记录可以保存为梦境,永久珍藏。保存后的梦境可以公开分享,也可以接续对话。还可以创建小剧场为角色添加背景小传、特殊场景、片段故事、生活话题等更为丰富的信息,甚至连载番外。在小剧场基础上,筑梦师可以与角色进行“故事感”更为强烈的对话。 后续会持续完善亲密度玩法、有情感的角色声音、全面丰富的形象、完善的人物关系链······ 【自动订阅服务说明】 1.订阅服务: a)筑梦岛VIP连续包月(1个月)、筑梦岛VIP连续包季(3个月) b)筑梦岛SVIP连续包月(1个月)、筑梦岛SVIP连续包季(3个月) 2.订阅价格: a)筑梦岛VIP:连续包月产品为 16元/月,连续包季产品为42元/季 b)筑梦岛SVIP:连续包月产品为 36元/月、连续包季产品为94元/季 3. 付款:用户确认购买并付款后计入iTunes账户 4.自动续费:苹果iTunes账户会在到期前24小时内扣费,扣费成功后订阅周期顺延一个订阅周期 5.关闭服务:您可以在苹果手机“设置”-->进入“iTunesStore 与 App store”-->点击 “Apple ID”,选择"查看 Apple ID”,进入"账户设置"页面,点击“订阅”,管理自动订阅服务,如需取消,每个计费周期结束前24小时关闭即可,到期前24小时内则不再扣费 6.服务协议: a)付费会员服务协议:https://h5.zhumengdao.com/h5/about/lawAgreement?agreementId=175 b)自动续费服务协议:https://h5.zhumengdao.com/h5/about/lawAgreement?agreementId=176

Screenshots

叨叨3 screens
筑梦岛4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 筑梦岛 at 49% against 叨叨's 0%. 筑梦岛 also leads on rating (2.9 vs 2.1) and update cadence (every 2 weeks vs monthly). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 叨叨 sells 10 in-app purchases, starting at $2.49 per month and 筑梦岛 sells 23 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

筑梦岛 holds the better App Store score, 2.9 against 2.1. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 筑梦岛 has 72 ratings behind it against 10, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of 叨叨's written reviews are positive against 49% of 筑梦岛's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

叨叨 ships an update monthly, 筑梦岛 every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 24, 2026 and September 21, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
叨叨 versus 筑梦岛: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter叨叨筑梦岛
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.1 (10 ratings)2.9 (72 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews48.7% of reviews — better
Number of ratings1072 — better
Update frequencyMonthlyEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsYesYes
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS13.012.2 — better
Further details — not scored
Size196 MB406 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperSHANGHAI ZIGUHONGLAN AI TECHNOTOGY CO.,LTD上海筑梦岛人工智能科技有限公司

Customer experience

叨叨

All ratings10 ratings
Positive20.0%
Neutral10.0%
Negative70.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

筑梦岛

All ratings72 ratings
Positive45.8%
Neutral5.6%
Negative48.6%
Written reviews78 reviews
Positive48.7%
Neutral15.4%
Negative35.9%

In-app purchases

10 purchases

叨叨

Subscriptions3
  • 自动订阅一个月3 variants$2.491 Month
  • 自动包月$2.491 Month
  • 自动订阅一年$3.991 Year
One-time7
  • 42奶糖$0.99
  • 25颗钻石$2.99
  • 126奶糖$2.99
Show 4 more
  • 1个月VIP$2.99
  • 210奶糖$3.99
  • 6个月VIP$9.99
  • 476奶糖$9.99
23 purchases

筑梦岛

Subscriptions4
  • VIP会员连续包月1 Month trial$1.991 Month
  • 筑梦岛SVIP会员连续包月1 Month trial$4.991 Month
  • 筑梦岛VIP会员连续包季3 Months trial$5.993 Months
Show 1 more
  • 筑梦岛SVIP会员连续包季3 Months trial$12.993 Months
One-time19
  • 筑梦岛VIP会员周卡$0.99
  • 筑梦岛高级朋友圈月卡$0.99
  • 1元(100贝壳)$0.99
Show 16 more
  • 3元(300贝壳)$0.99
  • 6元(600贝壳)$0.99
  • 筑梦岛SVIP会员周卡$1.99
  • 12元(1200贝壳)$1.99
  • 筑梦岛VIP会员月卡$2.99
  • 筑梦岛高级朋友圈季卡$3.99
  • 30元(3000贝壳)$3.99
  • 筑梦岛SVIP会员月卡$5.99
  • 50元(5000贝壳)$6.99
  • 筑梦岛VIP会员季卡$7.99
  • 筑梦岛高级朋友圈年卡$12.99
  • 98元(9800贝壳)$14.99
  • 筑梦岛SVIP会员季卡$17.99
  • 128元(12800贝壳)$19.99
  • 298元(29800贝壳)$39.99
  • 598元(59800贝壳)$89.99

Questions

Is 叨叨 free?
叨叨 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 筑梦岛 free?
筑梦岛 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 叨叨 or 筑梦岛?
筑梦岛 is rated higher. 叨叨 averages 2.1 out of 5 from 10 ratings, while 筑梦岛 averages 2.9 from 72 ratings.
Do 叨叨 or 筑梦岛 have ads?
Both 叨叨 and 筑梦岛 show ads.
Which is updated more often, 叨叨 or 筑梦岛?
叨叨 ships an update monthly, and 筑梦岛 every 2 weeks. Most recently, 叨叨 was updated on September 24, 2026 and 筑梦岛 on September 21, 2026.

Other comparisons