Comparison

微信输入法 vs 秒去水印王

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

微信输入法

A sleek and efficient typing application with smart spelling corrections, emoji suggestions, various input modes including voice-to-text, and quick input tools like commonly used phrases and spell check to enhance typing speed and accuracy. Check it out for faster and more precise typing!

Features
Read full description

【问 AI 支持 DeepSeek/Hunyuan 深度回答】 支持在输入过程中随时获取和分享 AI 回答,生活百科、文案助手、深度回答随手可得。 【拼写 Plus 模式】 拥有问 AI、表情推荐、定制表情等功能,在聊天交流中,可以更便捷的分享你想表达的内容或表情。 【多种输入模式】 支持6种键盘输入模式和语音转文字功能,可以满足你的个性化输入需求,不用长按即可快捷语音转文字。 【快捷输入工具】 常用语、剪贴板、手写找字、拼写检查等功能,常用语快捷发送,让你的输入更快、更准。 隐私政策: https://wetype.weixin.qq.com/web/privacy?platform=ios

About

秒去水印王

Features
Read full description

支持功能 支持多平台视频图片解析处理、图片色彩增强、老旧图片修复、图片变清晰、图片无损放大等功能 【支持如下功能】 **多平台解析,国内外短视频解析** 0:实况图,提取、生成实况图片 1:视频解析,可以快速提取视频 2:图片解析,可以快速提取图片 3:图片色彩增强,将色彩暗淡的图片进行修复,使其变得更加亮丽 4:图片变清晰,将模糊不清的图片进行修复,使其变得更加清晰 5:老旧图片修复,将老旧黑白图片进行上色处理,使其变得更加美观 6:图片无损放大,将规格较小的图片进行放大处理,并且使其保持原有的像素 【订阅会员说明】 1.订阅服务:(包月/包季/包年/永久)会员 2.订阅周期:包月/包季/包年/永久;订阅周期内,用户可体验Vip会员免除广告 3.订阅价格:包月6元/包季15元/包年38元/永久66元 4.付款:确认购买后,将从您的iTunes账户扣款 5.用户协议|隐私政策:https://www.ktyyapp.cn/miao/ys

Screenshots

微信输入法4 screens
秒去水印王4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 微信输入法 at 4.0 against 秒去水印王's 2.3. 微信输入法 also leads on in-app purchases (none vs 4) and ads (none vs shown). 秒去水印王's advantage is update cadence (every 2 days vs every 3 weeks). On price, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 秒去水印王 sells 4 one-off in-app purchases. 微信输入法 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

微信输入法 holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 2.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 微信输入法 has 786 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

微信输入法 ships an update every 3 weeks, 秒去水印王 every 2 days. The most recent releases landed on November 13, 2026 and November 12, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 4 level
微信输入法 versus 秒去水印王: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter微信输入法秒去水印王
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (786 ratings) — better2.3 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews41.8% of reviews—
Number of ratings786 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeksEvery 2 days — better
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.115.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size441 MB103 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperTencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited联江 何

Bugs and requests

微信输入法

Reported bugs

3 issues
  • Unreliable language switching
  • Unexpected crashes and freezes
  • Incorrect word predictions and auto-corrections

Requested features

5 requests
  • Clipboard function
  • Customizable keyboard layout
  • Improved English input and autocorrect
  • Seamless cross-device sync
  • Simplified Chinese-Traditional Chinese conversion

秒去水印王

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

微信输入法

No in-app purchases

4 purchases

秒去水印王

One-time4
  • 月度会员$0.99
  • 季度会员$1.99
  • 年费会员$4.99
Show 1 more
  • 永久会员$9.99

Questions

Is 微信输入法 free?
微信输入法 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 秒去水印王 free?
秒去水印王 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 微信输入法 or 秒去水印王?
微信输入法 is rated higher. 微信输入法 averages 4.0 out of 5 from 786 ratings, while 秒去水印王 averages 2.3 from 3 ratings.
Do 微信输入法 or 秒去水印王 have ads?
秒去水印王 shows ads; 微信输入法 does not.
Which is updated more often, 微信输入法 or 秒去水印王?
微信输入法 ships an update every 3 weeks, and 秒去水印王 every 2 days. Most recently, 微信输入法 was updated on November 13, 2026 and 秒去水印王 on November 12, 2026.

Other comparisons