金盾离线版 vs 医通办
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
金盾离线版
Read full descriptionHide full description
金盾视频加密单机离线授权所使用的播放器，用来播放金盾视频加密方案加密的视频，视频原创者可以用客户端工具对视频进行加密，用户需要输入播放密码才可以播放，一机一码，防止用户未经授权传播文件。金盾视频加密方案一共分为三大板块：在线播放、网络授权离线播放、离线单机授权播放，此播放器为离线单机授权播放器
医通办
Read full descriptionHide full description
医通办APP是医师电子化注册移动工作平台，基于安全可信技术实现医师精准管理。 为全国医师提供电子化注册的实名、实人认证服务、状态变更实时查看；围绕医师电子化注册业务办理、科室维护、基本信息查看和信息发布平台；扫码、亮码、出示电子证照等服务。
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: 金盾离线版 at 4.0 against 医通办's 1.4. 金盾离线版 also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). 医通办's advantage is review sentiment (14% vs 0%) and ratings volume (9 vs 2). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
金盾离线版 holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 1.4. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 9 respectively. Written reviews complicate that: 0% of 金盾离线版's written reviews are positive against 14% of 医通办's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.
| Parameter | 金盾离线版 | 医通办 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.0 (2 ratings) — better | 1.4 (9 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | 13.6% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 2 | 9 — better |
| Update frequency | — | Every 2 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 11.0 — better | 13.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 42 MB | 39 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Tianjin Jinruan Tianxia Technology Co., Ltd. | 北京民科医疗科技有限公司 |
Customer experience
金盾离线版
医通办
In-app purchases
金盾离线版
No in-app purchases
医通办
No in-app purchases
