OxMET vs BioCog
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
OxMET
This tool provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. It is automatically scored and evaluated against age-adjusted norms, generating a visual snapshot report for clinical use.
- Ecologically valid assessment
- Naturalistic shopping scenario
- Automatic scoring
- Age-adjusted norms
- Visual snapshot report
- Standardized and validated
Read full descriptionHide full description
OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke). The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.
BioCog
Read full descriptionHide full description
The BioFINDER group's digital test suite has been optimised to effectively isolate problems with cognitive health, testing several domains relevant to the onset of cognitive impairment and potential Alzheimer's disease. It has been developed and compiled by experienced neurologists and neuropsychiatrists and includes immediate and delayed memory recall, symbol digit test, trail making, face-occupation and orientation. A study-related active ID is required to perform the tests. The user will be guided through the tests with text and voice-over, for which the following languages are currently supported: Swedish, English, Dutch, Italian, Spanish, Catalan and Finnish.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is update cadence: BioCog at monthly against OxMET's every 22 months. OxMET's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 17.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
OxMET ships an update every 22 months, BioCog monthly. Both last shipped on October 5, 2026.
| Parameter | OxMET | BioCog |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.0 (1 ratings) — better | — |
| Number of ratings | 1 — better | — |
| Update frequency | Every 22 months | Monthly — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 11.0 — better | 17.6 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 111 MB | 55 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | University of Oxford | Lund University |
In-app purchases
OxMET
No in-app purchases
BioCog
No in-app purchases






