阿苇岛 vs 霞岛
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
阿苇岛
Read full descriptionHide full description
阿苇岛iOS客户端 欢迎，阿苇岛是一个前台匿名后台实名的，旨在为大家提供一个理性客观中立讨论环境的平台，核心精神：开放包容，理性客观，有事说事，就事论事。
霞岛
Read full descriptionHide full description
霞岛是X岛匿名版的第三客户端。 欢迎来到X岛，一个半全新的（中老年）泛ACG匿名社区 App特色功能： 快速导入饼干，一键登岛 多标签页浏览
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: 阿苇岛 at 3.9 against 霞岛's 3.0. 阿苇岛 also leads on review sentiment (33% vs 0%) and ratings volume (8 vs 2). 霞岛's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
阿苇岛 holds the better App Store score, 3.9 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 8 and 2 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 33% of 阿苇岛's written reviews are positive against 0% of 霞岛's.
| Parameter | 阿苇岛 | 霞岛 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 3.9 (8 ratings) — better | 3.0 (2 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 33.3% of reviews — better | 0.0% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 8 — better | 2 |
| Update frequency | Every 2 weeks | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.1 | 11.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 54 MB | 67 MB |
| Age rating | 9+ | 9+ |
| Developer | 康 孙 | 奇 骆 |
Customer experience
阿苇岛
霞岛
In-app purchases
阿苇岛
No in-app purchases
霞岛
No in-app purchases
