Comparison

阿苇岛 vs 跨友Trans

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

阿苇岛

Features
Read full description

阿苇岛iOS客户端 欢迎,阿苇岛是一个前台匿名后台实名的,旨在为大家提供一个理性客观中立讨论环境的平台,核心精神:开放包容,理性客观,有事说事,就事论事。

About

跨友Trans

A dedicated platform for transgender and gender non-conforming individuals to connect through live streaming and social matching. It fosters a community based on equality, respect, and inclusivity, offering features like live interaction, a story community, and local meetups.

Highlights
  • Live streaming with hosts
  • Story sharing community
  • Interest-based matching
  • Local social networking
  • Private chat with gift requests
  • Real-name verification for users
Read full description

·跨友APP为MTF伪娘FTM酷儿CDTS女装大佬等跨性别人士打造的同城直播交友专属平台! ·我们的理念是:和有故事的跨友玩在一起,平等、尊重、包容,彼此守护! ·全新的社交匹配模式,丰富的互动功能,在这里可以遇见想认识的那个TA,圈内人都在这等你哦! |直播互动:海量主播颜艺俱佳,陪你度过无聊时光! |故事社区:优质用户常驻,分享心情随拍,你和TA的故事,从这里开始! |缘分速配:根据你的兴趣和喜好,为您匹配推荐优质用户,助你找到红颜知己! |同城交友:同城陌生人交友,线上交友聊天,为你找到附近的TA! |私聊许愿:可以许愿想要的礼物,培养感情,让交友更好玩更有趣! |达人社区:根据人气值进行达人排名,每天都能看到不一样的TA! |真实社交:跨友用户均要求实名认证,不用担心网络风险! |礼物展馆:您的专属礼物馆,展示您的所有礼物收获! 隐私政策:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DZXRzQk52Ym54a3Ns 用户许可协议:https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Screenshots

阿苇岛4 screens
跨友Trans4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 跨友Trans at 5.0 against 阿苇岛's 3.9. 跨友Trans also leads on review sentiment (67% vs 33%) and iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.1). 阿苇岛's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 10). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 跨友Trans sells 10 in-app purchases, starting at $5.99 per month. 阿苇岛 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

跨友Trans holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.9. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 8 and 3 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 33% of 阿苇岛's written reviews are positive against 67% of 跨友Trans's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 weeks. Both last shipped on October 24, 2026.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
阿苇岛 versus 跨友Trans: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter阿苇岛跨友Trans
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.9 (8 ratings)5.0 (3 ratings) — better
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews66.7% of reviews — better
Number of ratings8 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeksEvery 2 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
Monetization—Free with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.112.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size54 MB184 MB
Age rating9+17+
Developer康 孙成都蓝创智慧科技有限公司

Customer experience

阿苇岛

All ratings7 ratings
Positive71.4%
Neutral0.0%
Negative28.6%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative66.7%

跨友Trans

All ratings4 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

In-app purchases

None

阿苇岛

No in-app purchases

10 purchases

跨友Trans

Subscriptions1
  • 包月合伙人$5.991 Month
One-time9
  • 购买1260豆子$2.99
  • 内购项目$3.99
  • 1个月合伙人$6.99
Show 6 more
  • 购买4060豆子$7.99
  • 3个月合伙人$14.99
  • 内购产品$14.99
  • 12个月合伙人$29.99
  • 购买13860豆子$29.99
  • 购买41860豆子$89.99

Questions

Is 阿苇岛 free?
阿苇岛 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 跨友Trans free?
跨友Trans is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 阿苇岛 or 跨友Trans?
跨友Trans is rated higher. 阿苇岛 averages 3.9 out of 5 from 8 ratings, while 跨友Trans averages 5.0 from 3 ratings.
Do 阿苇岛 or 跨友Trans have ads?
Neither 阿苇岛 nor 跨友Trans shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 阿苇岛 or 跨友Trans?
阿苇岛 ships an update every 2 weeks, and 跨友Trans every 2 weeks. Most recently, 阿苇岛 was updated on October 24, 2026 and 跨友Trans on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons