Comparison

Site Checker vs WAS

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Site Checker

This app provides web tool utilities to monitor network connection stability and website availability. It includes HTTP tests for API checks and a downtime detector to verify site access globally. Useful for system administrators and web developers to troubleshoot DNS and ISP connection issues.

Highlights
  • WiFi and mobile data connection monitoring
  • HTTP test for REST API checks
  • Downtime detector for site access
  • Works on 3G/4G/5G/LTE and WiFi
  • Supports VPN and proxy servers
  • Troubleshoots DNS and ISP connection issues
Read full description

Site Checker — a set of web tool utilities for monitoring the stability of your WiFi and mobile data connection. This application has a built-in HTTP test for REST API checks and a downtime detector to verify site access from different countries. The app works on 3G/4G/5G/LTE and WiFi networks, like home and corporate ones. You can use the app even with a VPN or proxy server on your router. With just a couple of clicks, check if your favorite sites are down right now. This is a must-have web tool for system administrators and web developers, helping to solve problems with DNS and test connections on your ISP's nodes. Get the app today and check your network speed and website availability!

About

WAS

Easily switch between mobile and desktop website views with a single click. Test your own websites or browse any site as it would appear on different devices using custom user-agent strings. This browser simplifies cross-device testing without needing emulators.

Highlights
  • Switch between mobile and desktop views
  • Change user-agent strings
  • Built-in WebView browser
  • Add custom user agents
  • Quick compatibility testing settings
  • Content verification tools
Features
Read full description

The WAS browser allows you to switch between mobile and desktop views of a website with one click. Now you can browse any site or test your own by changing the user-agent string—which determines how the website is displayed. With the built-in WebView browser, you can see how your site will look on various smartphones, screens, and devices without needing to buy them or install additional emulators. WAS offers a wide range of built-in user agents, but if they aren't enough, you can easily add or create your own. Additionally, the application includes many built-in settings for quick compatibility testing and content verification. Download the app now and say goodbye to the hassle of testing websites on different devices!

Screenshots

Site Checker3 screens
WAS3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: WAS at 4.6 against Site Checker's 3.4. WAS also leads on update cadence (fortnightly vs every 2 months) and ratings volume (96 vs 12). On price, review sentiment, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Site Checker costs $1.99 and WAS $2.49 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

WAS holds the better App Store score, 4.6 against 3.4. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: WAS has 96 ratings behind it against 12, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 50% of Site Checker's written reviews are positive against 54% of WAS's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Site Checker ships an update every 2 months, WAS fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on October 12, 2026 and October 21, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Site Checker versus WAS: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSite CheckerWAS
Price$1.99 — better$2.49
Rating3.4 (12 ratings)4.6 (96 ratings) — better
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews53.8% of reviews — better
Number of ratings1296 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsFortnightly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaidPaid
DevicesiPhone, iPad, MaciPhone, iPad, Mac
Requires iOS16.016.0
Further details — not scored
Size10 MB10 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperTamara DudarenkoAndreii Simaranov

Customer experience

Site Checker

All ratings12 ratings
Positive58.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative41.7%
Written reviews8 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%

WAS

All ratings95 ratings
Positive89.5%
Neutral3.2%
Negative7.4%
Written reviews13 reviews
Positive53.8%
Neutral7.7%
Negative38.5%

In-app purchases

None

Site Checker

No in-app purchases

None

WAS

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Site Checker free?
Site Checker costs $1.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is WAS free?
WAS costs $2.49, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Site Checker or WAS?
WAS is rated higher. Site Checker averages 3.4 out of 5 from 12 ratings, while WAS averages 4.6 from 96 ratings.
Do Site Checker or WAS have ads?
Neither Site Checker nor WAS shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Site Checker or WAS?
Site Checker ships an update every 2 months, and WAS fortnightly. Most recently, Site Checker was updated on October 12, 2026 and WAS on October 21, 2026.

Other comparisons