Comparison

CloudLabs Soil Granulometry vs Granumetric

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CloudLabs Soil Granulometry

Read full description

In this simulator, granulometric analysis is performed to identify three different soil samples, in order to determine which is the right application for each one of them. This laboratory includes a scale, crucibles, a sieve with a holding arm, a heating oven and a metal shovel.

About

Granumetric

Read full description

Granumetric optimises particle-size distributions for powder, aggregate and slurry mixes. You enter sieve or laser data for each component, choose a packing or statistical target, and read the mass recipe that best matches the curve — on iPhone, iPad and Mac, from one math core. The target is a dry solid-volume packing curve unless you switch to a certificate or a mass-basis model. Sliders always move mass fractions. Moisture is kept on the batch, not on the packing plot. WHAT YOU CAN DO • Blend two or more granulometries on a shared particle-size axis (test sieves ISO 3310 / GOST 6613 and laser-diffraction equivalents ISO 13320). • Fit to two Funk–Dinger packing models (classic 1994 and with grain-shape parameter α), Fuller, Andreasen, Bolomey, Gates–Gaudin–Schuhmann, Rosin–Rammler (Weibull), a custom passing table, or a certificate envelope. • See the mix curve, the reference, and each feed; switch a linear or logarithmic size axis; stack charts or sit them side by side. • Read quality numbers: maximum and root-mean-square passing error, specific surface, fineness modulus, the sizes at which 10 %, 50 % and 90 % of the material passes (d10 / d50 / d90), and uniformity. • Open a local gallery of construction, ceramics, pigments, food, peat, mining, metallurgy, additive-manufacturing, pharmaceutical and soil examples. • Run 28 auxiliary calculators in the full version (Blaine specific surface, Stokes settling, Kozeny permeability, Hazen drainage, Ergun packed-bed pressure drop, Bond grinding work, foundry-sand fineness number, ternary diagram, water demand, pigment volume concentration, flow, and more). • Export a PDF report for free; a CSV table of the recipe is a full-version extra. A JSON file of your own project is always free. FREE AND FULL Free: five starter examples (sand + crushed stone, cement + limestone, filler + pigment, mix certificate, 316L stainless-steel powder), two components, 16 size classes, packing and classical statistical targets, local save, PDF and JSON. Full version (one lifetime purchase): every bundled example, up to 20 components and 80 classes, all fitting methods, the density library, the calculator toolbox, and CSV export. WHO IT IS FOR The program is for process and materials engineers who must set mass fractions of several particulate feeds so the blended passing curve matches a packing model, a mill-product distribution, a standard grading envelope, or a third-party certificate. Fractions, comparison basis (dry solid volume or dry mass) and class residuals stay explicit; the calculation does not replace sieve or laser analysis. Typical workplaces: • concrete plants and construction-materials laboratories — sand and crushed-stone skeletons, limestone filler, self-compacting mixes, GOST or European envelopes, fineness modulus; • ceramic and refractory works, slip laboratories — porcelain, grog with clay, glazes, alumina castables to Andreasen or Funk–Dinger; • pigment, coatings and compound lines — unlike true densities, where mass fraction is not the solid-volume fraction in the film; • food dry-mix plants and peat works — moisture on the weigh-out, packing compared on dry solid; • mineral processing, sintering and milling — circuit feed, ore and return, grinding work; • foundry and powder-metallurgy laboratories — moulding sand and metal powders; • additive-manufacturing laboratories — narrow laser distributions of 316L, polyamide 12 and titanium alloys; • pharmaceutical solid-dosage development; soil-mechanics laboratories (drainage, filters); teaching laboratories in materials science.

Screenshots

CloudLabs Soil Granulometry1 screens
Granumetric4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: CloudLabs Soil Granulometry at none against Granumetric's 1. CloudLabs Soil Granulometry also leads on iOS requirement (10.0 vs 17.0). Granumetric's advantage is device support. On price there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Granumetric sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. CloudLabs Soil Granulometry asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard3 real differences · 3 level
CloudLabs Soil Granulometry versus Granumetric: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCloudLabs Soil GranulometryGranumetric
PriceFreeFree
Update frequency—Weekly
Ads—No
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
Devices—iPhone, iPad, Mac — better
Requires iOS10.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size202 MB6 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperJiovany OrozcoIlya Obraztsov

In-app purchases

None

CloudLabs Soil Granulometry

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

Granumetric

One-time1
  • Full version$29.99

Questions

Is CloudLabs Soil Granulometry free?
CloudLabs Soil Granulometry is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Granumetric free?
Granumetric is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

Other comparisons