Comparison

Quick XC Meet vs Triple Jump Video Analysis

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Quick XC Meet

This app allows coaches to easily set up and score cross country meets, manage rosters, and record mile splits. Spectators and athletes can view live results and scores without needing an account.

Highlights
  • Create coach accounts
  • Set up and score meets
  • Add team rosters
  • Record mile splits
  • View live results
  • View live scores
Features
Read full description

Coaches can create an account with an email and password. Then coaches can quickly set up a meet, add rosters, and run/score a meet. Coaches can also record mile splits. Fans/Athletes don't need to create an account. Fans/Athletes can see live results and scores.

About

Triple Jump Video Analysis

This app analyzes pre-recorded videos of jumps, providing detailed biomechanical insights and measurements for each phase. It helps optimize technique with frame-by-frame playback, calibration tools, and comprehensive analysis reports.

Highlights
  • Biomechanical insights
  • Frame-by-frame playback
  • Multi-point calibration system
  • Phase distance and timing analysis
  • Velocity flow analysis
  • Technique assessment reports
  • Recommended drills
Features
Read full description

This powerful app analyzes pre-recorded video, delivering precise biomechanical insights and detailed measurements tailored to the hop, step, and jump phases. Calibrate confidently with our robust multi-point system. Visualize each phase with full frame-by-frame playback and receive comprehensive analysis reports covering phase distances, contact times, angles, velocities, power metrics, and technique assessments. Whether optimizing approach, phase distribution, or landing mechanics, our presets support all levels from novices to elite competitors. User calibration of each jump using our multi-point Calibration System provides the best analysis: • Athlete Height → vertical measurements • Athlete Gender → performance benchmarks • Automatic hop/step/jump tracking • Takeoff Board → position validation • Hip height baseline calibration • Hip height @ the board calibration • Peak height @ the board calibration How it works: • Tap to place markers on video thumbnail • Tap twice for Takeoff Board’s draggable Vertical Line Markers • Drag to adjust - markers are fully draggable • Visual feedback with icons and labels • Help system: Built-in tutorial explaining how to calibrate Full Video Playback with Frame-by-Frame Controls: • Frame backward button • Stop button (returns to start) • Play/Pause toggle • Frame forward button • Speed control menu (0.25x, 0.5x, 1x) • Time Slider - Shows current time and allows scrubbing through the video with precise timestamp display Emailed analysis can include: MEASUREMENT DATA Total Jump Distance (official) Hop Distance Step Distance Jump (final) Distance Phase Distribution (% and meters) PHASE TIMING & CONTACT Approach Time Penultimate Time Board Takeoff Time Hop Flight Time Hop Contact Time Step Flight Time Step Contact Time Jump Flight Time Pit Landing Time PHASE TRANSITIONS Hop-to-Step Ratio Step-to-Jump Ratio Phase Balance Score Transition Smoothness Metric VELOCITY FLOW ANALYSIS Approach > Hop loss Hop > Step loss Step > Jump loss Total Loss PHASE BREAKDOWNS Distance (per phase) Hang Time (per phase) Ground Contact (per phase) Velocity in > out Velocity loss (per phase) Score (per phase) AND MORE: Recommended drills Elite comparison

Screenshots

Quick XC Meet4 screens
Triple Jump Video Analysis4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Quick XC Meet at 4.0 against Triple Jump Video Analysis's 3.0. Quick XC Meet also leads on update cadence (fortnightly vs every 5 weeks) and ratings volume (4 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Quick XC Meet holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Quick XC Meet ships an update fortnightly, Triple Jump Video Analysis every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 3, 2026 and October 31, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 6 level
Quick XC Meet versus Triple Jump Video Analysis: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterQuick XC MeetTriple Jump Video Analysis
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (4 ratings) — better3.0 (1 ratings)
Number of ratings4 — better1
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS16.6 — better17.6
Further details — not scored
Size4 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperBrian SeaverSydney White

In-app purchases

None

Quick XC Meet

No in-app purchases

None

Triple Jump Video Analysis

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Quick XC Meet free?
Quick XC Meet is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Triple Jump Video Analysis free?
Triple Jump Video Analysis is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Quick XC Meet or Triple Jump Video Analysis?
Quick XC Meet is rated higher. Quick XC Meet averages 4.0 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while Triple Jump Video Analysis averages 3.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Quick XC Meet or Triple Jump Video Analysis have ads?
Neither Quick XC Meet nor Triple Jump Video Analysis shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Quick XC Meet or Triple Jump Video Analysis?
Quick XC Meet ships an update fortnightly, and Triple Jump Video Analysis every 5 weeks. Most recently, Quick XC Meet was updated on November 3, 2026 and Triple Jump Video Analysis on October 31, 2026.

Other comparisons