Comparison

GoodTerm vs ObsidianIOT

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

GoodTerm

A modern remote terminal and server companion for Linux/macOS. Connect via SSH or Mosh, monitor system health, transfer files, and run saved commands. Features cross-device sync and an AI assistant for command suggestions.

Highlights
  • SSH and Mosh secure remote access
  • Live system health monitoring
  • File transfer and port forwarding
  • Saved snippets and batch execution
  • Cross-device workspace sync
  • AI assistant for command help
Read full description

GoodTerm is a modern remote terminal and server companion for Linux/MacOS infrastructure. Connect with SSH or Mosh, monitor system health in real time, transfer files, run saved snippets across machines, and keep your workspace in sync across devices. Built for focused remote work, GoodTerm combines powerful server tools with a clean, polished experience. Features: Secure remote access with SSH and Mosh Live Linux monitoring for CPU, memory, disk, network, and NVIDIA GPU status Smooth terminal experience designed for Apple platforms File transfer and port forwarding Snippets and batch execution for repetitive workflows Cross-device sync for machines, identities, snippets, and settings AI assistant for command suggestions, explanations, and troubleshooting Whether you manage one server or many, GoodTerm helps you stay fast, informed, and in control. Privacy Policy: https://goodterm.playstone.top/privacy Terms of Use: https://goodterm.playstone.top/terms

About

ObsidianIOT

This application optimizes solar energy systems, including trackers, battery storage, and street lights. It uses real-time data and predictive analytics for efficient energy management and remote monitoring.

Highlights
  • Real-time solar tracker adjustment
  • Intelligent solar battery management
  • Adaptive solar street lighting
  • Predictive analytics for energy optimization
  • Remote monitoring and control
  • Scalable architecture for various installations
Features
Read full description

Obsidian, as an IoT green technology solution, can play a significant role in controlling and optimizing solar tracker systems, solar battery storage, and solar street lights. Here's an expanded look at how this could be achieved: 1. Solar Trackers Real-Time Monitoring and Adjustment: Obsidian can be used to control solar trackers by leveraging real-time data such as sun position, weather conditions, and energy demand. It can adjust the angle of solar panels to maximize sunlight exposure throughout the day, increasing energy efficiency. Predictive Analytics: Using historical data and weather forecasts, Obsidian could predict the best positioning for solar panels in advance, ensuring that they are optimally aligned even before changes in sunlight occur. 2. Solar Battery Systems Intelligent Energy Management: Obsidian can manage the charging and discharging cycles of solar batteries by monitoring energy production and consumption patterns. This ensures that energy is stored when production is high and used efficiently when needed. Grid Interaction: The system could also facilitate smart interaction with the power grid, deciding when to draw energy from the grid or when to feed excess solar power back into it. This helps in balancing energy supply and demand while minimizing reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Health Monitoring: Obsidian can continuously monitor the health and performance of the battery system, predicting maintenance needs, and extending battery life by avoiding overcharging or deep discharging. 3. Solar Street Lights Adaptive Lighting: Obsidian can control solar street lights based on real-time environmental data, adjusting the brightness according to factors like ambient light levels, weather conditions, and human presence. This reduces energy consumption while ensuring safety. Remote Control and Monitoring: The system can offer remote control capabilities, allowing city planners or facility managers to monitor the status of solar street lights, detect faults, and manage lighting schedules from a central dashboard. Energy Optimization: By integrating with other IoT sensors (e.g., motion detectors), Obsidian can dynamically manage lighting, dimming or turning off lights in areas with no activity, and fully illuminating spaces only when needed. 4. Integration and Scalability Interconnected Ecosystem: Obsidian can create an interconnected ecosystem where all components (solar trackers, battery systems, and street lights) work together to optimize overall energy usage and efficiency. Scalable Architecture: Its modular and scalable nature allows it to be deployed in various settings, from small residential systems to large-scale industrial or municipal solar installations. 5. Environmental Impact Sustainability Reporting: Obsidian can collect and analyze data related to energy savings, carbon footprint reduction, and overall system efficiency, providing valuable insights and reports that can be used to demonstrate environmental benefits. Proactive Maintenance: By predicting potential issues and facilitating timely maintenance, Obsidian can reduce downtime and extend the lifespan of solar infrastructure, contributing to sustainability goals. By integrating Obsidian into solar technology systems, it becomes a powerful tool for enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and environmental impact of solar energy solutions.

Screenshots

GoodTerm4 screens
ObsidianIOT4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: ObsidianIOT at none against GoodTerm's 2. GoodTerm's advantage is ratings volume (7 vs 2). On price, rating, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. GoodTerm sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per month. ObsidianIOT asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for GoodTerm against 5.0 for ObsidianIOT. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 7 and 2 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

GoodTerm ships an update every 2 months, ObsidianIOT every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on June 20, 2026 and June 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
GoodTerm versus ObsidianIOT: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterGoodTermObsidianIOT
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (7 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings7 — better2
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 6 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
MonetizationFreemiumFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, Mac — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS17.0 — better17.5
Further details — not scored
Size57 MB7 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPLAYSTONE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDAndre Troncoso

Customer experience

GoodTerm

All ratings6 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

ObsidianIOT

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

2 purchases

GoodTerm

Subscriptions2
  • Premium Monthly$1.991 Month
  • Premium Annual$14.991 Year
None

ObsidianIOT

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is GoodTerm free?
GoodTerm is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is ObsidianIOT free?
ObsidianIOT is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, GoodTerm or ObsidianIOT?
GoodTerm and ObsidianIOT are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 7 and 2 ratings respectively.
Do GoodTerm or ObsidianIOT have ads?
Neither GoodTerm nor ObsidianIOT shows ads.
Which is updated more often, GoodTerm or ObsidianIOT?
GoodTerm ships an update every 2 months, and ObsidianIOT every 6 weeks. Most recently, GoodTerm was updated on June 20, 2026 and ObsidianIOT on June 1, 2026.

Other comparisons