SR vs Screen Recorder
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
SR
Easily record your iPhone or iPad screen with unlimited recording time. Capture gameplay, live streams, or any on-screen activity with microphone support. Customize recording parameters like resolution and frame rate.
- Unlimited screen recording
- Microphone support during recording
- Adjustable resolution, bit rate, and frame rate
- One-click recording start
- Supports iPhone and iPad
Read full descriptionHide full description
SR is a super easy-to-use screen recorder & recording app that supports iphone and ipad, game and live recording can be started with one click -Features 1. Record the screen for unlimited time. 2. Support the use of the microphone function during screen recording. 3. Support parameter adjustment such as resolution, bit rate, frame rate direction, etc. Download SR now and start making your own creations.
Screen Recorder
Effortlessly capture your screen and camera for tutorials, game streams, or video demos. Create engaging content with features like multi-platform streaming, video reversal, and GIF conversion.
- Live streaming to multiple platforms
- Reverse video clips
- Convert video segments to GIF
- Record screen and camera
- Create tutorials and demos
Read full descriptionHide full description
Qveedo: Screen Recorder - Capture your gaming prowess and app experiences on iPhone and iPad effortlessly with our Live Stream & Screen Recorder. Perfect for tutorials, game walk-throughs, and video demos, it's your go-to for creating engaging training videos in a unique and dynamic way. 1. Streaming to Multiple Platforms: - Functionality: This feature enables users to broadcast their screen or camera feed simultaneously to various platforms like YouTube, Twitch, Facebook Live, and others. It's particularly useful for content creators, educators, and professionals who want to maximize their reach across different audiences. - Technology and Implementation: Achieving this would require robust server infrastructure and seamless integration with various streaming services' APIs. Real-time encoding and transcoding capabilities are crucial to ensure compatibility with different platforms’ requirements. - User Experience: The interface would need to be intuitive, allowing users to easily select their streaming destinations, adjust settings like resolution and bitrate, and monitor their streams in real-time. 2. Reversing Videos: - Functionality: This feature allows users to reverse their video clips, creating unique and creative content. This can be used for artistic purposes, in educational content, or simply for entertainment. - Technology and Implementation: Implementing video reversal would involve developing algorithms that can efficiently process video frames in reverse order without compromising the video quality. This feature would also require a user-friendly editing interface. - User Experience: Users should be able to easily select the portion of the video they want to reverse and preview the results in real-time. Additional options like reversing the audio track or adjusting the speed of the reversed video could enhance this feature. 3. Converting Video to GIF: - Functionality: This feature lets users convert segments of their videos into GIFs. GIFs are widely used in social media, messaging, and online forums for their ability to convey emotions, reactions, and messages succinctly. - Technology and Implementation: The conversion process involves extracting selected frames from a video and compiling them into a looped GIF format. The challenge is to maintain an optimal balance between the GIF’s quality and file size. - User Experience: An ideal interface would allow users to select their video, choose the start and end points for the GIF, and possibly add text or filters. The ability to preview the GIF before finalizing and options for resolution and frame rate would also be important. In addition to these core features, the platform could offer advanced options like live chat integration for streams, custom branding for videos and GIFs, and analytics to track viewer engagement. The integration of cloud-based storage for saving projects and the ability to share content directly from the platform to social media or via email could add further convenience for users. Overall, such a platform would cater to a diverse range of users, from social media influencers and marketers to educators and casual users, offering a one-stop solution for various video content creation and sharing needs. The key to success would be in providing a seamless, user-friendly experience while maintaining high-quality outputs across all features. Subscription pricing and terms: Qveedo: Screen Recorder - Offers an auto-renewing monthly subscription at US$1.99 an auto-renewing quarterly subscription at US$3.99 and an auto-renewing yearly subscription at US$9.99 to provide you with unlimited access to the application features while you maintain an active subscription. Privacy Policy: https://atharva-system.github.io/screenrecorder.github.io/privacy-policy.html Terms and conditions: https://atharva-system.github.io/screenrecorder.github.io/terms-and-condition.html
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: Screen Recorder at none against SR's shown. Screen Recorder also leads on update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 5 weeks). SR's advantage is review sentiment (100% vs 67%) and iOS requirement (14.0 vs 17.0). On price, rating, ratings volume and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. SR sells 1 one-off in-app purchase and Screen Recorder sells 6 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per 7 days. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.
SR holds the better App Store score, 4.8 against 4.6. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 66 and 30 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 100% of SR's written reviews are positive against 67% of Screen Recorder's.
SR ships an update every 5 weeks, Screen Recorder every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 27, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | SR | Screen Recorder |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.8 (66 ratings) — better | 4.6 (30 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better | 66.7% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 66 — better | 30 |
| Update frequency | Every 5 weeks | Every 2 weeks — better |
| Ads | Yes | No — better |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Monetization | Free with in-app purchases | Free with in-app purchases |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 14.0 — better | 17.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 24 MB | 130 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | 列峰 胡 | Atharva System |
Customer experience
SR
Screen Recorder
In-app purchases
SR
- SRpro$0.99
Screen Recorder
- Screen Recorder: Weekly Pro$0.997 Days
- Screen Recorder: Monthly Pro$4.991 Month
- Screen Recorder: Quarterly Pro$6.993 Months
Show 3 moreShow fewer
- Screen Recorder: Yearly Pro$12.991 Year
- Screen Recorder: Yearly Offer1 Year trial$12.991 Year
- Screen Recorder: Yearly$12.991 Year
Questions
Is SR free?
Is Screen Recorder free?
Which has better reviews, SR or Screen Recorder?
Do SR or Screen Recorder have ads?
Which is updated more often, SR or Screen Recorder?
Other comparisons















