Comparison

RRS HLF vs Filterjam

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

RRS HLF

This audio plugin offers broad tonal sculpting with 12 dB per octave low and high cut filters. It allows for precise frequency subtraction to enhance musicality in mixes, compensating for hardware signal loss with unity gain.

Highlights
  • 12 dB/octave low and high cut filters
  • Retro-tonal sculpting
  • Special effects
  • Compensates for insertion loss
  • Unity gain upon insertion
  • Simple three-control interface
Read full description

The HLF-3C completes the Passive EQ Collection. This plug-in has 12 dB per octave low and high cut filters, providing broad retro-tonal sculpting or bygone-era special effects, without the inconvenience of insertion loss found with the unamplified passive hardware. You can easily subtract the unnecessary frequencies in any instrument and sub-group so they stay wonderfully musical in the mix. The original HLF-3C hardware unit is a true passive design: there are no input/output amplifiers and it does not require any external power. As a result, there is an inherent loss of signal level when using the HLF-3C hardware. The RRS HLF-3C plug-in compensates for this inherent signal loss for simplified use in the modern era: it has unity gain upon insertion (there is no insertion loss until one or both of the cut filters is engaged). The HLF-3C interface is very simple and includes only three controls: • Enable — This toggle switch is the plug-in bypass control. When in the down position (bypassed), plug-in processing is disabled altogether. The plug-in is engaged with the switch is in the up position. This switch can be used to compare the processed settings to that of the original signal; • Low Cut — This rotary switch specifies the cutoff frequency of the low cut filter. Ten frequencies are available: 50, 80, 100, 150, 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500 and 2000 CPS; • High Cut — This rotary switch specifies the cutoff frequency of the high cut filter. Ten frequencies are available: 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 15 KCS. To use HLF-3C as a plug-in, you need an AUv3-compatible host app like GarageBand, Auria, AUM, Cubasis and more — HLF-3C will appear in the list of Audio Unit extensions for effect plug-ins in the host app.

About

Filterjam

This app offers a multiband resonant filter for creating unique audio effects. It divides input signals into four bands, allowing for various sonic manipulations from subtle enhancements to extreme sound mangling.

Highlights
  • Multiband resonant filtering
  • 4-band signal division
  • Sum or multiply band modes
  • Versatile sound shaping
  • Ringmod-like effects
Features
Read full description

Filterjam is a multi-band resonant filter delivering weird ringmod-like filtered sounds. The input signal is divided into 4 bands that are then summed or multiplied together according to the selected mode. Filterjam can be very harsh or gentle, it can add brightness or depth to synth sounds, but it can also completely mangle acoustic sources.

Screenshots

RRS HLF4 screens
Filterjam2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: RRS HLF at every 3 months against Filterjam's every 22 months. RRS HLF also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 83%) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 14.0). On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for RRS HLF against 5.0 for Filterjam. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 19 and 34 respectively. Written reviews are what separate them: 100% of RRS HLF's written reviews are positive against 83% of Filterjam's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

RRS HLF ships an update every 3 months, Filterjam every 22 months. Both last shipped on November 3, 2026.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
RRS HLF versus Filterjam: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterRRS HLFFilterjam
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (19 ratings) — better5.0 (34 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews — better83.3% of reviews
Number of ratings1934 — better
Update frequencyEvery 3 months — betterEvery 22 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better14.0
Further details — not scored
Size22 MB25 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperRRS, OOOAudioThing Ltd.

Customer experience

RRS HLF

All ratings19 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews5 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Filterjam

All ratings34 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews6 reviews
Positive83.3%
Neutral16.7%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

RRS HLF

No in-app purchases

None

Filterjam

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is RRS HLF free?
RRS HLF is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Filterjam free?
Filterjam is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, RRS HLF or Filterjam?
RRS HLF is rated higher. RRS HLF averages 5.0 out of 5 from 19 ratings, while Filterjam averages 5.0 from 34 ratings.
Do RRS HLF or Filterjam have ads?
Neither RRS HLF nor Filterjam shows ads.
Which is updated more often, RRS HLF or Filterjam?
RRS HLF ships an update every 3 months, and Filterjam every 22 months. Most recently, RRS HLF was updated on November 3, 2026 and Filterjam on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons