Comparison

LCAST vs CraniCalc

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

LCAST

This medical tool aids healthcare professionals in assessing the plausibility of bruising in young children. It utilizes a validated clinical decision rule to help identify potential abuse by analyzing bruise characteristics and body locations. The app serves as a screening tool to inform decision-making and educate users on bruising patterns.

Highlights
  • Bruising clinical decision rule (TEN-4-FACESp)
  • Interactive 3D body model for inputting observations
  • Compares bruise findings to published evidence
  • Screening tool for children under 4.0 years
  • Educational tool for healthcare providers
  • Data based on multi-center NIH-funded study
Features
Read full description

The Lurie Children’s Child Injury Plausibility Assessment Support Tool (LCAST) is an app based on a validated Bruising Clinical Decision Rule (BCDR) called the TEN-4-FACESp. Use of this tool has the potential to improve recognition of abuse in young children with bruising. This app functions only as a screening tool and cannot be used to diagnose abuse. The app applies to children less than 4.0 years of age with bruising. If the child is older than 4.0 and/or bruising is not present, this tool cannot be used. In those circumstances, alternative methods of screening for abuse are needed. WHY FOCUS ON BRUISING? Bruising is the most common injury resulting from physical abuse and is the most overlooked or misdiagnosed antecedent injury prior to an abuse-related fatality or near-fatality in a young child. Bruising occurs from both accidental and abusive trauma, but differences identified by the TEN-4-FACESp bruising clinical decision rule may allow improved and earlier recognition of the abused child. ABOUT THE APP: The app is intended for clinical use by licensed healthcare professionals and providers. The app can inform decision-making and be used as an educational tool for learning about bruising characteristics that commonly result from abusive and accidental injury. The core feature of the app is an interactive 3D body model that allows the user to utilize visual cues of the human body to input clinical observations. The result is the opportunity to compare a child’s bruise findings to the published evidence resulting from a NIH-funded multi-center study. The data that drive the app are based on 2,161 patients of which 410 (19%) were classified by a multi-disciplinary panel of medical experts as abuse and 1,713 (79%) as accident. The TEN-4-FACESp bruising clinical decision rule resulted from analysis of 35 body regions and is 96% specific and 87% sensitive for distinguishing bruising from abuse versus accident. The TEN-4-FACESp has three components based on: 1) specific body regions with bruising, 2) patterned bruising, and 3) bruising anywhere on non-mobile infants. An affirmative finding for any one of the three TEN-4-FACESp components without a clear and reasonable explanation indicates a potential risk for abuse. The child may warrant further evaluation and consultation with an expert in child abuse should be considered. In addition to using the data in this app, the user should always check with a doctor before making any medical decisions.

About

CraniCalc

Features
Read full description

CraniCalc brings PECARN and the pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines (pBIG) together in a native, offline calculator for clinicians caring for children with head injuries. PECARN helps guide the initial head CT decision after minor blunt head trauma. Age-specific questions follow the published decision tree and show the recommendation, the findings behind it, and the risk reported in the study. Study-group percentages are not individualized risk estimates. pBIG classifies traumatic findings identified on head CT and presents the corresponding care plan. A concise patient summary makes it easy to review the entered findings and reopen them for editing. Features include an age-specific Glasgow Coma Scale calculator, clinical references, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and calculation methodology explaining implementation decisions. Calculations run on your device without an account or internet connection. Entries are saved locally and cleared after 24 hours without activity. CraniCalc is intended for clinical decision support. It does not replace clinical judgment, and results should be interpreted in the context of the individual patient.

Screenshots

LCAST3 screens
CraniCalc4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: LCAST at 9.0 against CraniCalc's 16.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
LCAST versus CraniCalc: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterLCASTCraniCalc
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (8 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings8 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 21 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS9.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size146 MB17 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperigNew, LLC dba SlingshotJacob Beniflah, MD

In-app purchases

None

LCAST

No in-app purchases

None

CraniCalc

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is LCAST free?
LCAST is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CraniCalc free?
CraniCalc is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do LCAST or CraniCalc have ads?
Neither LCAST nor CraniCalc shows ads.

Other comparisons